Quantcast
Home / The VLW Blog / FedEx no substitute for certified mail

FedEx no substitute for certified mail

Oops, silly me! Thinking Federal Express was just as good as, maybe even better than, registered or certified mail.

Rena Lindevaldsen represents the biological mother in the celebrated custody case of Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins. The Virginia Court of Appeals had ruled that Vermont courts have jurisdiction over the custody of the child the mother delivered when she was in a civil union with another woman.

Lindevaldsen knew that she had 30 days from the denial of her petition for a rehearing in the Court of Appeals to file her petition for appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia. And since the 30th day was a Sunday and the next day was President’s Day, she called the clerk’s office to make sure that mailing the petition on Tuesday would be all right.

But she didn’t think to ask, nor was she told, about any requirement for the method of delivery. Rule 5:5 specifies certified or registered mail, but she sent the petition by Federal Express the evening of the deadline day. When it arrived the next morning, the clerk’s office called to tell her that it was late because it was not sent by registered or certified mail.

Lindevaldsen’s motion asking the court to consider the petition timely filed is pending.

The relief an advisory committee on appellate rules has in mind may be a little late. Last year, the committee recommended proposals adding Federal Express, UPS and other commercial carriers to the list of acceptable forms of delivery. However, approval of the proposals by the Supreme Court probably is many months away.

3 comments

  1. Yet another example of the unyielding rules that govern Virginia Supreme Court appellate practice. Our legislature should step in and override the the existing Rules matrix for appeals that is designed purely to thwart Virginia practitioners. A starting point includes review of the much more lenient procedures that governs federal appellate procedure.

  2. I couldn’t agree more! These rules are burdensome, to say the least. If an attorney can prove he put the document in the mail and has a receipt for same, that document should be considered timely filed…..VSC Rules are just not up to date with the speed of today’s world.
    Anonymous

  3. The rules may not be up-to-date, but that is no excuse for not folowing them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top