Criminal – Drug Conspiracy – Hearsay – Confrontation Clause
By Deborah Elkins
Published: May 12, 2008
The Court of Appeals rejects a defendant’s claims that the trial court erred under both state hearsay rules and the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause by admitting into evidence hearsay statements made by his alleged coconspirators, and defendant’s drug conspiracy conviction is affirmed.
We hold defendant failed to preserve the state hearsay claims for appeal and his ...
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
|
| Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
|
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered. (Roll mouse over pictures below)
![]() - Print and Online - |
![]() - Online Only - |
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.





Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.
Comments