Quantcast

Criminal – Drug Conspiracy – Hearsay – Confrontation Clause (access required)

By Deborah Elkins
Published: May 12, 2008

The Court of Appeals rejects a defendant’s claims that the trial court erred under both state hearsay rules and the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause by admitting into evidence hearsay statements made by his alleged coconspirators, and defendant’s drug conspiracy conviction is affirmed. We hold defendant failed to preserve the state hearsay claims for appeal and his ...
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.

Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

VLW Verdicts & Settlements

Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.

Log in to search the V & S Database

Submit a Verdicts & Settlements Report

GET THE VLW DAILY ALERT

The Daily Alert from Virginia Lawyers Weekly brings you the latest legal news every morning in your e-mail. You’ll get headline news, a link to the day’s Top Opinion and more!

Click here to sign up for the Alert

STAY CONNECTED WITH VLW

Stay up-to-date with the latest news and information from Virginia Lawyers Weekly by subscribing to our RSS feeds and visiting our social media pages.

Feeds/Web 2.0:

Influential Women of Virginia 2012