Quantcast

Criminal – Appeals – Procedural Default – Proffer (access required)

By Deborah Elkins
Published: July 21, 2008

A defendant’s conviction for cocaine distribution is affirmed by the Court of Appeals because he procedurally defaulted his claim that the trial court erred in refusing to permit him to cross-examine his codefendant about the codefendant’s discussions with his attorney. Defendant did not proffer or avouch for the record what the codefendant would have said had ...
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.

Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

VLW Verdicts & Settlements

Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.

Log in to search the V & S Database

Submit a Verdicts & Settlements Report

GET THE VLW DAILY ALERT

The Daily Alert from Virginia Lawyers Weekly brings you the latest legal news every morning in your e-mail. You’ll get headline news, a link to the day’s Top Opinion and more!

Click here to sign up for the Alert

STAY CONNECTED WITH VLW

Stay up-to-date with the latest news and information from Virginia Lawyers Weekly by subscribing to our RSS feeds and visiting our social media pages.

Feeds/Web 2.0:

Influential Women of Virginia 2012