Civil Procedure – Settlement Conference – Authorized Representative – Sanctions
By
Published: October 23, 2008
A Roanoke U.S. District Court declines to sanction ALPS for failing to have an authorized representative appear in person at a settlement conference ordered by the magistrate judge, where the court had granted summary judgment days earlier to the defendant law firm and the “parties remained light years apart in settlement.”
Hinkle Oil & Gas Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love LLP (USDC-WD) (VLW 008-3-473) (6 pp.)
![[Print]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
© Copyright 2013 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.
Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.
POST A COMMENT