Contract – Accounting Firm Purchase – Due Diligence
By Deborah Elkins
Published: January 7, 2009
Defendant buyers of an accounting business, sued on their $145,000 promissory note, lose on summary judgment their counterclaim alleging fraud based on claims that plaintiff sellers failed to make disclosures and impeded buyers’ efforts to perform due diligence on the firm prior to completing the asset purchase agreement, in this case from the Norfolk U.S. District Court.
White v. Nicholas Potocska PC (USDC-ED) (VLW 008-3-552) (58 pp.)
![[Print]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/facebook.png)
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.
VLW Verdicts & Settlements
Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.
Log in to search the V & S Database
Submit a Verdicts & Settlements Report
 |
GET THE VLW DAILY ALERT
The Daily Alert from Virginia Lawyers Weekly brings you the latest legal news every morning in your e-mail. You’ll get headline news, a link to the day’s Top Opinion and more!
Click here to sign up for the Alert
STAY CONNECTED WITH VLW
Stay up-to-date with the latest news and information from Virginia Lawyers Weekly by subscribing to our RSS feeds and visiting our social media pages.
POST A COMMENT