Quantcast

‘Move-over law’ is trap for drivers

By Peter Vieth
Published: July 6, 2009

Motorists who carefully follow the instructions printed on a state highway sign still could end up facing traffic charges under Virginia’s so-called “move-over law.”

The signs tell motorists to “move over or reduce speed” for stopped emergency vehicles. As Arlington lawyer Chris Leibig explained, however, the law itself does not say anything about slowing down. Instead, Virginia Code § 46.2-921.1 requires drivers to change lanes if possible, unless it would be “unreasonable or unsafe.” In such a case, the motorist must “proceed with due caution” and “maintain a safe speed for highway conditions.” Violation carries a possible jail sentence.

The discrepancy in the sign language might not matter if it were not for recent enforcement efforts that, according to Leibig, target drivers who fail to change lanes, regardless of whether they slow down.

In a recent published essay, Leibig described his representation of a Fairfax County man who was ticketed in a state police operation specifically targeting violators of the 2002 move-over law. Leibig said his client was driving in the right lane of Interstate 95 on a Sunday morning when he spotted a trooper on the shoulder with lights flashing. Concerned about traffic in the left lane, the driver did not move over. Instead he slowed down and cautiously passed the stopped police car, according to Leibig.

The client was stopped and charged with violation of the move-over law, which carries a possible 12-month jail sentence and a $2,500 fine. There was no courtroom showdown over the sign language, however. Leibig said his client, with a clean record, was allowed to take a driver safety class to avoid a conviction.

Nevertheless, Leibig said, the case signals that slowing down is not enough to avoid a ticket, despite the language on the 14 highway signs around the state suggesting that reducing speed is all that’s required.

“The trooper did not disagree that the sign was wrong,” Leibig said.

Asked to comment on the apparent discrepancy, a Virginia State Police spokesman said the signs, posted by the Virginia Department of Transportation, are “advisories to the motoring public warning drivers that there is such a law in the Commonwealth.”

The VSP’s written response also notes that the “headline” of the code section reads, “Drivers to yield right-of-way or reduce speed when approaching stationary emergency vehicles on highways.” The state code, however, states that headlines of code sections are mere catchwords and “do not constitute part of the act of the General Assembly.”

Leibig readily acknowledges that the move-over law addresses a real problem for law enforcement and others who use emergency vehicles. “Anyone who has stood beside a broken down car on a 55-mile-an-hour interstate highway understands the danger police must confront to enforce traffic laws on the highways,” Leibig wrote. “We all know most of the cars are doing at least seventy, and half of the drivers are paying attention to something other than driving.”

A Roanoke police officer described a recent experience helping a trooper on a highway. “While with him, several cars came buzzing down the fog line at highway speed, inches from our cars,” the officer wrote in his blog, The Roanoke Cop. “Despite having two other empty lanes, in the middle of the night, people will disregard our emergency lights and see how close they can come to hitting us.”

The next night, the officer wrote, he and a trooper each stopped a driver who buzzed them without moving over. “We could have leap frogged each other all night up and down that highway if we had the time,” he wrote.

According to a Mar. 29 state police news release, 18 law enforcement personnel were struck and killed nationwide in 2008 while standing outside of their vehicles. Virginia is one of 40 states with a move-over law, according to the release.


© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.

Comments

  • Brit Sapp says:

    The “Move Over Law” is NOT a trap … it’s simply common sense! Unfortunately, there is a severe glut of Idiots in Virginia (esp. Northern Virginia) that have prompted this law.

    It’s a good and valid law, and hopefully it will force a more cautious driver onto our highways and byways!

    Posted on 04/17/10 at 6:58 am
  • Louis Friend says:

    This is just another example of a poorly written law abused to levy heavy fines against the citizens of Virginia. The law clearly states the requirements for motorists (move over or maintain the posted speed). A ticket to the contrary should be fought in court. I won’t get into my disdain for law enforcement who crack down on speeding when that same manpower can be used for better activities like thwarting real crimes. As a taxpayer I would like to see this law repealed.

    Posted on 02/07/11 at 7:04 am

POST A COMMENT

VLW Verdicts & Settlements

Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.

Log in to search the V & S Database

Submit a Verdicts & Settlements Report

GET THE VLW DAILY ALERT

The Daily Alert from Virginia Lawyers Weekly brings you the latest legal news every morning in your e-mail. You’ll get headline news, a link to the day’s Top Opinion and more!

Click here to sign up for the Alert

STAY CONNECTED WITH VLW

Stay up-to-date with the latest news and information from Virginia Lawyers Weekly by subscribing to our RSS feeds and visiting our social media pages.

Feeds/Web 2.0:

Influential Women of Virginia 2012