Quantcast
Home / The VLW Blog / Edwards hopes to attract experienced judges

Edwards hopes to attract experienced judges

One of the effects of the General Assembly’s repeated refusal to increase the mandatory retirement age for  judges is to discourage experienced attorneys from seeking seats on the bench, laments Sen. John Edwards, D-Roanoke.

Speaking to the Roanoke Bar Association Tuesday, Edwards noted the House of Delegates has regularly shot down bills he’s introduced to raise the judge retirement age from age 70 to 75 or 73.

Edwards argued it would save money for the state retirement fund and would encourage judicial candidates with more years of law practice.

“The Supreme Court wants it. They lobbied heavily for it,” Edwards said, adding, “Justice Koontz wants it, badly.” Justice Lawrence Koontz will have to retire this year under the current mandatory retirement age.

Edwards said the combination of reduced retirement credits and the early mandatory retirement age discourages lawyers from seeking judgeships later in their careers. “What you’re doing is making it less desirable for really fine lawyers who might be wonderful judges – say in their mid-50′s,” Edwards said. “I think we need to reverse that.”

By Peter Vieth

3 comments

  1. Lori D. Thompson

    The title to this blog is misleading. Senator Edwards’ point was that he supports extending the retirement age so that (i) experienced practitioners (i.e. those who are older lawyers) will be willing to become a judge later in their careers, and (ii) we will continue to benefit from our experienced, knowledgable judges currently on the bench who want to continue to serve after age 70. How is that seeking younger lawyers?

  2. I too noticed the misleading title of this blog — the previous comment is exactly right.

    Senator Edwards has been a strong proponent of changing Virginia law to allow judges to remain on the bench past the age of 70, and in fact he was the patron of Senate Bill 206 this past session, which proposed to extend the mandatory judicial retirement age to 73.

    Please correct the error.

  3. Lori was correct. The headline has been redone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top