<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hudson is first to strike down health care law&#160;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/12/14/hudson-is-first-to-strike-down-health-care-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/12/14/hudson-is-first-to-strike-down-health-care-law/</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jordanger</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/12/14/hudson-is-first-to-strike-down-health-care-law/comment-page-1/#comment-23485</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jordanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=58926#comment-23485</guid>
		<description>The title of this article (\Hudson is first to strike down health care law\) and its first sentence are misleading and inaccurate and contradicted by other parts of the article, in particular the penultimate sentence (\Hudson ruled, however, that only the individual mandate was unconstitutional and let the rest of the act stand.\).  Setting aside the merits of Judge Hudson&#039;s decision, your article&#039;s title and opening paragraph should accurately summarize what that decision did, in fact, do and not do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of this article (\Hudson is first to strike down health care law\) and its first sentence are misleading and inaccurate and contradicted by other parts of the article, in particular the penultimate sentence (\Hudson ruled, however, that only the individual mandate was unconstitutional and let the rest of the act stand.\).  Setting aside the merits of Judge Hudson&#8217;s decision, your article&#8217;s title and opening paragraph should accurately summarize what that decision did, in fact, do and not do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
