Legal Zoom preps to fight VSB’s UPL bill
By
Published: January 18, 2011
Tags: Ethics, General Assembly, Virginia State Bar
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
|
| Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
|
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered. (Roll mouse over pictures below)
![]() - Print and Digital - |
![]() - Digital Only - |
© Copyright 2013 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.




![[Print]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://valawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)

Refine your search for VLW Verdict & Settlement Reports or send us your case results for publication. Database search feature available to VLW subscribers only - login required.
so let’s see. .. a consumer goes to a website that is filled with disclaimers telling the consumer that they aren’t dealing with a lawyer and that the site and its products are no substitute for hiring an attorney.
Acting on his own intelligence and using reason, the consumer says “you know what, I’m smart enough to read and I want to work with this website anyway.”
Where is the victim in this?
I agree with Scott Street: a(nother) misguided effort to protect consumers.