Comments on: Bill: Warrant would be needed for GPS tracking  http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/ VA Lawyers Weekly Fri, 03 May 2013 14:39:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bonnie Russell http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/comment-page-1/#comment-30786 Bonnie Russell Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:56:07 +0000 http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/bill-warrant-would-be-needed-for-gps-tracking/#comment-30786 As I just reported former attorney and current therapist Thomas Fuchs was the third San Diego father to wipe out his family in less than a month, http://www.familylawcourts.com/Kids_Killed, that GPS with Victim Notification (So the monitoring staffer can alert the intended victim in time enough to save their own life...not to mention state resources), needs to be in Family Court. So many family court cases are not in their proper venue, namely criminal court, due to failure of police to respond appropriately, See VIdeo testimony, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhOrh1_Oa3c that GPS with victim notification needs to be in Family Court. Unlike those in Criminal Court where GPS with Victim Notification is use, Family Court judges continue their refusal to protect those in their court. As I just reported former attorney and current therapist Thomas Fuchs was the third San Diego father to wipe out his family in less than a month,
http://www.familylawcourts.com/Kids_Killed, that GPS with Victim Notification (So the monitoring staffer can alert the intended victim in time enough to save their own life…not to mention state resources), needs to be in Family Court. So many family court cases are not in their proper venue, namely criminal court, due to failure of police to respond appropriately, See VIdeo testimony,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhOrh1_Oa3c

that GPS with victim notification needs to be in Family Court. Unlike those in Criminal Court where GPS with Victim Notification is use, Family Court judges continue their refusal to protect those in their court.

]]>