Quantcast

Lawyer, Client Sanctions Upheld (access required)
012-6-001

By Deborah Elkins
Published: January 18, 2012

Tags: , ,

In this case of a falling-out between a real estate agent and defendant clients and the agent they later hired to sell a property belonging to a living trust, the first agent, a realty company and their lawyer, all were properly sanctioned under Va. Code § 8.01-271.1 for pursuing three versions of a complaint alleging ...
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.

Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

VLW Verdicts & Settlements

Virginia Lawyers Weekly is pleased to introduce the VLW Verdicts & Settlements database. Subscribers have free access to the beta version for a limited time. Target your search based on jurisdiction, judge, lawyer, expert or injury.

Search the Verdicts & Settlements Database

Submit a Verdicts & Settlements Report

GET THE VLW DAILY ALERT

The Daily Alert from Virginia Lawyers Weekly brings you the latest legal news every morning in your e-mail. You’ll get headline news, a link to the day’s Top Opinion and more!

Click here to sign up for the Alert

STAY CONNECTED WITH VLW

Stay up-to-date with the latest news and information from Virginia Lawyers Weekly by subscribing to our RSS feeds and visiting our social media pages.

Feeds/Web 2.0: