Detective Comment Not ‘Interrogation’
By Deborah Elkins
Published: January 19, 2012
Tags: Justice William C. Mims, Search & Seizure, Supreme Court of Virginia
Although a detective may have directly addressed defendant, who had asked for a lawyer, when he repeated that a co-defendant had made a statement about deciding to rob a “white lady” and hit her in the head with a brick, the detective’s comments were not the functional equivalent of interrogation, and the Supreme Court of ...
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
|
| Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
|
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered. (Roll mouse over pictures below)
![]() - Print and Online - |
![]() - Online Only - |
© Copyright 2012 Virginia Lawyers Media. All Rights Reserved.





Virginia Lawyers Weekly is pleased to introduce the VLW Verdicts & Settlements database. Subscribers have free access to the beta version for a limited time. Target your search based on jurisdiction, judge, lawyer, expert or injury.
Comments