Home / Opinion Digests Employment Law / Prosthesis Removal Not a ‘Replacement’ (access required)

Prosthesis Removal Not a ‘Replacement’ (access required)

A teacher who had a full ankle replacement after she broke her ankle stepping into a hole on the playground cannot qualify for a longer limitations period for her change-in-condition application under Va. Code § 65.2-708(A)(ii) on the ground that the later removal of the prosthesis and use of a surgical fusion of her ankle ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Scroll To Top