http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/20/supreme-court-nixes-changes-in-lawyer-ad-rules/ VA Lawyers Weekly Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:18:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/20/supreme-court-nixes-changes-in-lawyer-ad-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-31311 Joel D. Bieber Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:12:58 +0000 http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69653#comment-31311 Ben, I wonder if nine lawyers could discuss legal advertising and the application of the Constitution; and be able to find some agreement? Ben, I wonder if nine lawyers could discuss legal advertising and the application of the Constitution; and be able to find some agreement?

]]> http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/20/supreme-court-nixes-changes-in-lawyer-ad-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-31307 Ben Glass Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:08:31 +0000 http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69653#comment-31307 the new rule restricting the advertising of a certification in a specialty is contrary to the US Supreme Court's holding in the Peel case. 110 S.Ct. 2281 the new rule restricting the advertising of a certification in a specialty is contrary to the US Supreme Court’s holding in the Peel case. 110 S.Ct. 2281

]]> http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/20/supreme-court-nixes-changes-in-lawyer-ad-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-31306 Ben Glass Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:20:27 +0000 http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69653#comment-31306 Of course it is NOT impossible to predict with certainty the future results of some cases. There are many, many cases where the future result is, with 100% certainty, "you will lose your case." So what is now being required to be inserted into such a disclaimer is, as a matter of reality, wrong. Of course it is NOT impossible to predict with certainty the future results of some cases. There are many, many cases where the future result is, with 100% certainty, “you will lose your case.” So what is now being required to be inserted into such a disclaimer is, as a matter of reality, wrong.

]]>