Quantcast
Home / 2012 / September (page 3)

Monthly Archives: September 2012

Software Licensee Wins on Nonsolicitation Claim (access required)

In this dispute between two competing providers of a specialized insurance service over a confidentiality and licensing agreement for proprietary software for one provider to administer the service to the other provider, the Alexandria U.S. District Court grants summary judgment ...

Read More »

Jurisdictional Amount Satisfied by Damage Claim (access required)

An auto service center franchisor can stay in federal court because its complaint for breach of contract alleging defendant failed to pay the advertising expenses or operational fee under the contract and failed to properly transfer assets alleges damages over ...

Read More »

‘Show Cause’ Ordered for Sealing Request (access required)

In this litigation over plaintiff company’s complaint that AOL, Google and other defendants have used plaintiff’s search advertising systems to infringe two of plaintiff’s patents, the magistrate judge for the Norfolk U.S. District Court says the parties must appear and ...

Read More »

‘Show Cause’ for Motion to Seal (access required)

In this litigation over plaintiff company’s complaint that AOL, Google and other defendants have used plaintiff’s search advertising systems to infringe two of plaintiff’s patents, the magistrate judge for the Norfolk U.S. District Court says the parties’ briefs and exhibits ...

Read More »

Plaintiff Not ‘Diligent’ in Discovery Effort (access required)

In a shipyard employee’s “hybrid” Section 301 suit against his union local and the terminal that fired him, the magistrate judge for the Norfolk U.S. District Court says plaintiff’s lawyer waited too long to serve discovery and denies his request ...

Read More »

Payroll Count May Show Title VII ‘Employer’ (access required)

A daycare teacher who alleges she was demoted then terminated in violation of Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act has raised a genuine issue of material fact that defendant daycare center is a covered employer, says a magistrate ...

Read More »