<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Choice-of-Law for Promissory Estoppel Claim&#160;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/30/no-choice-of-law-for-promissory-estoppel-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/30/no-choice-of-law-for-promissory-estoppel-claim/</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Marrs</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/30/no-choice-of-law-for-promissory-estoppel-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-31374</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Marrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71154#comment-31374</guid>
		<description>The key issue here, as in Ward&#039;s Equipment, seems to be that the choice-of-law clause specified that non-VA law applied to the contract&#039;s interpretation or to disputes arising out of the contract.  That would seem to exclude application of the non-VA law to other causes of action.  If the choice-of-law provision specified that all aspects of the parties&#039; relationship were governed by the other state&#039;s law, it seems to me the outcome would have been different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key issue here, as in Ward&#8217;s Equipment, seems to be that the choice-of-law clause specified that non-VA law applied to the contract&#8217;s interpretation or to disputes arising out of the contract.  That would seem to exclude application of the non-VA law to other causes of action.  If the choice-of-law provision specified that all aspects of the parties&#8217; relationship were governed by the other state&#8217;s law, it seems to me the outcome would have been different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
