http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/supreme-court-questions-legality-of-warrantless-dna-collection/ VA Lawyers Weekly Fri, 24 May 2013 16:43:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/supreme-court-questions-legality-of-warrantless-dna-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31581 Andrew G. Wiggin Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:44:09 +0000 http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72860#comment-31581 Bravo to the Maryland police to use what they presently are allowed to use to find a rapist. If another man has been wrongly sitting in prison for that rape, I am sure he is delighted! What should scare us more than police using Q-tips, is a state's Attorney General's office arguing that because someone is stopped by the police, that you are now in a "class" of people who "surrenders a substantial amount of liberty and privacy." Apparently, if the police suspect you of a possible crime, you lose rights. I thought you keep your rights, and the government is restricted in doing their job to the degree of having to honor your rights -- Constitutional and statutory. www.post-trial-litigation.com Bravo to the Maryland police to use what they presently are allowed to use to find a rapist. If another man has been wrongly sitting in prison for that rape, I am sure he is delighted!
What should scare us more than police using Q-tips, is a state’s Attorney General’s office arguing that because someone is stopped by the police, that you are now in a “class” of people who “surrenders a substantial amount of liberty and privacy.” Apparently, if the police suspect you of a possible crime, you lose rights. I thought you keep your rights, and the government is restricted in doing their job to the degree of having to honor your rights — Constitutional and statutory.
http://www.post-trial-litigation.com

]]>