Quantcast
Don't Miss
Home / Opinion Digests / No UM/UIM ‘Stacking’ for Policy Omission (access required)

No UM/UIM ‘Stacking’ for Policy Omission (access required)

Although an auto liability policy failed to specify any specific amount of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage provided, that omission did not mean the policy terms prohibiting “stacking,” or combining coverage for multiple insured vehicles, were ambiguous under Virginia law and would allow stacking, and the 4th Circuit affirms the district court’s denial of additional coverage to ...

Print, Digital & Mobile

1 Month
$39

----------
6 Months
$199

----------
1 Year
$369

----------
2 Years
$659

----------
Digital & Mobile Only

1 Year
$299

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top