Home / Opinion Digests / Lawyer Was ‘Incompetent,’ Not ‘Frivolous’ (access required)

Lawyer Was ‘Incompetent,’ Not ‘Frivolous’ (access required)

An assistant prosecutor was incompetent, in violation of Rule 1.1, in charging a defendant with illegal possession of a pain-killer drug even though defendant had purchased only fake medication in a police sting; but the Supreme Court of Virginia says the prosecutor did not violate Rule 3.1 regarding assertion of frivolous claims or Rule 3.8(a), ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Scroll To Top