(AP) The Supreme Court of Virginia heard competing arguments Wednesday on whether a judge erred in conducting a single trial for a former Democratic Party official charged with molesting three children.
In May 2012, an Arlington County Circuit Court jury convicted Michael Armin Gardner of molesting two girls who attended a slumber party for his daughter’s 10th birthday. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on a charge that Gardner molested another child the previous night when his daughter called him into her room to comfort her during a thunderstorm. A mistrial was declared on that count.
Gardner, 50, had been chairman of the Democratic committee in Falls Church and his wife is a former mayor. He was sentenced to 22 years in prison for aggravated sexual battery.
Gardner’s attorney, Peter Greenspun, told the justices that the accusations on consecutive nights should have been the subject of two separate trials because they were not part of a common scheme. Evidence presented on the charge related to the thunderstorm would not have been admissible in the slumber party accusation, he said.
“There is no connectedness,” Greenspun said. “There are distinct differences between the thunderstorm incident and the slumber party incident.”
Assistant Attorney General Benjamin H. Katz argued that Greenspun was focusing on “minute differences,” such as how the children were fondled, and obscuring the similarities.
“All of the offenses occurred under the defendant’s own roof on consecutive nights,” he said. “He took advantage of the lateness of the hour when they were most vulnerable.”
Greenspun and Katz also disagreed on whether the trial judge improperly excluded character witness testimony on whether Gardner had a reputation of being trustworthy around children.
The Supreme Court is likely to issue a ruling in June.
— LARRY O’DELL, Associated Press