Home / Opinion Digests / Business Law / Son Not Named as Home Occupant (access required)

Son Not Named as Home Occupant (access required)

Although plaintiff maintains the home his father contracted to have built was intended for him and he helped design the house and provided the initial funds for construction, the contract between his father and the builder does not identify plaintiff as an intended third-party beneficiary of the contract, and the Carroll County Circuit Court dismisses ...

Print, Digital & Mobile

1 Month

6 Months

1 Year

2 Years

Digital & Mobile Only

1 Year

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Scroll To Top