Don't Miss
Home / 2006 / November

Monthly Archives: November 2006

JANET MILLER-JENKINS v. LISA MILLER-JENKINS

Trial court erred in failing to recognize that the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act prevented its exercise of jurisdiction and required it to give full faith and credit to the custody and visitation orders of the Vermont court; the orders of the trial court are vacated and this matter is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

EDMOND ANTONIO WHITE v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s conviction of grand larceny; trial court?s admission of the challenged other crimes evidence was harmless error

Read More »

XAVIER ANTONIO POWELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s convictions of malicious wounding, aggravated malicious wounding, and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony

Read More »

MILLER-JENKINS v. MILLER-JENKINS

Trial court erred in failing to recognize that the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act prevented its exercise of jurisdiction and required it to give full faith and credit to the custody and visitation orders of the Vermont court; the orders of the trial court are vacated and this matter is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

WHITE v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s conviction of grand larceny; trial court?s admission of the challenged other crimes evidence was harmless error

Read More »

POWELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s convictions of malicious wounding, aggravated malicious wounding, and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony

Read More »

BARR v. BARR

Trial court?s interpretation of the property settlement agreement is affirmed; no error found in the entry of the final divorce decree

Read More »

STEPHEN L. BRYANT v. KERREN B. MCDOUGAL

Trial court erred in determining that the parties? oral agreement constituted a valid property settlement agreement under Code Section 20-155; judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded

Read More »

KEVIN LAMONT TUCKER v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s convictions of statutory burglary, use of a firearm in the commission of a burglary, and attempted malicious wounding

Read More »

PARIS ANTWAN BARNES v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant?s conviction for malicious wounding; trial court did not abuse its discretion when it considered appellant?s lack of remorse as a factor in imposing his sentence; judgment of the trial court affirmed

Read More »

BRYANT v. MCDOUGAL

Trial court erred in determining that the parties? oral agreement constituted a valid property settlement agreement under Code Section 20-155; judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded

Read More »

MAXWELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court erred in finding the Commonwealth?s evidence sufficient to prove that appellant constructively possessed the drugs; appellant?s convictions are reversed and the indictments are dismissed

Read More »

LASSITER v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court erred in concluding that intent to use, sell, or transfer the credit card was not an element of the offense charged; judgment reversed and case remanded

Read More »

MITCHELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in accepting the investigator?s qualifications; trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling the expert testimony did not invade the province of the jury

Read More »

JASPER CONSTRUCTION v. HABINA

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in affirming the senior claims specialist?s rejection of employer?s application as employer failed to comply with Rule 1.4(E)

Read More »

SWINDELL v. CLC OF RICHMOND

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding that claimant failed to prove he gave timely notice of his work-related accident to employer in accordance with Code Section 65.2-600

Read More »

TUCKER v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s convictions of statutory burglary, use of a firearm in the commission of a burglary, and attempted malicious wounding

Read More »

BARNES v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant?s conviction for malicious wounding; trial court did not abuse its discretion when it considered appellant?s lack of remorse as a factor in imposing his sentence; judgment of the trial court affirmed

Read More »

BOYD v. VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION

Summary affirmance ? circuit court did not err in affirming the decision of the Virginia Employment Commission finding appellant disqualified for unemployment compensation because she left work voluntarily without good cause

Read More »

IMMANUEL CYPRUS PERRY v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress; this Court does not address whether officers violated the knock-and-announce rule as a remedy for such a violation is not the suppression of evidence

Read More »

CHRISTOPHER ROOSEVELT SCOTT v. COMMONWEALTH

This Court holds that because the indictment was not amended and appellant made a timely objection to the lack of evidence to prove the offense occurred in the nighttime, appellant?s conviction for statutory burglary is reversed and the indictment is dismissed

Read More »

TERRY WAYNE WOLFORD v. COMMONWEALTH

This Court finds that appellant?s indictment and conviction for violating Code Section 46.2-817(B) were not barred by Code Section 19.2-294; evidence was sufficient to establish that appellant violated Code Section 46.2-817(B); as appellant did not prove ends of justice exception to Rule 5A:18, this Court cannot consider the merits of appellant?s other argument raised on appeal

Read More »

POLLY ANN GOODSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court erred by improperly allowing impeachment evidence; appellant?s conviction for solicitation to commit a felony is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

Read More »
Scroll To Top