Home / Fulltext Opinions (page 417)

Fulltext Opinions

Feed Subscription

Gray v. COMMONWEALTH

The evidence was sufficient for the trial court to find that appellant willfully, wantonly and culpably inflicted serious injury on his son such that he demonstrated a reckless disregard for human life.

Read More »

Hicks v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in the trial court's pretrial amendment of the indictment or its final judgment finding appellant guilty of statutory burglary.

Read More »

WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEATH

Evidence was sufficient to prove appellant possessed cocaine with the intent to distribute it. Police properly impounded the vehicle appellant was driving because he could neither produce proof of ownership nor a valid driver's license.

Read More »

McKenney v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant's motions were filed more than twenty-one days after the entry of the final sentencing order entered on December 18, 2001, the trial court did not err in dismissing for lack of jurisdiction appeallant's motion to modify his sentence and to reconsider the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Read More »

Hicks v. COMMONWEALTH

Sufficient evidence supports appellant's conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The trial court did not err in convicting appelant for this offense.

Read More »

Wyche v. COMMONWEALTH

The trial court did not err in finding that the victim's death was caused by appellant's unlawful and criminally negligent conduct.

Read More »

Branch v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant maliciously and intentionally struck the victim in the face without provacation with the intent to inflict serious injury.

Read More »

Orbe v. Johnson

The trial court did not err in refusing injunctive relief staying appellant's execution because it lacked power to grant such relief and because a declaratory judgment action could not serve as the vehicle for obtaining such relief, due to the removal of appellant's claimed constitutional issues from actual controversy by operation of a statute under which he was deemed to have selected the method of his execution. Appellant's appeal and his request for a stay of execution are denied.

Read More »

Jordan v. Jordan

The trial court considered wife's current needs and husband's current ability to pay prior to modifying the amount of spousal support, no error or abuse of discretion in the trial court's award.

Read More »

Harris v. Harris

The evidence was sufficient to retrace the husband's separate property,and, therefore, the trial judge's decision is reversed.

Read More »

Orbe v. Warden

A petition for writ of habeas corpus attempting to challenge the constitutionality of Virginia's lethal injection protocol is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where the petition failed to challenge petitioner's death sentence and either the fact or the duration of petitioner's imprisonment, and did not seek a determination that petitioner was entitled to an immediate or speedier release.

Read More »

Orbe v. Johnson

The trial court correctly dismissed appellant's declaratory judgment action seeking an adjudication that Virginia's lethal injection protocol violates the Constitution of Virginia and a permanent injunction preventing the use of such protocol in carrying out his execution where appellant was deemed, by operation of statute, to have selected lethal injection rather than electrocution as the method of his execution. Appellant's petition for appeal and motions attendant thereto are denied.

Read More »

Payne v. COMMONWEALTH

The first two issues are procedually barred. The third issue, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the contested testimony.

Read More »

Massa v. Massa

The trial court did not err in its award of spousal support to wife;denying husband's request to impute income to wife; and denying attorney's fees to either party.

Read More »

Booker v. COMMONWEALTH

Upon rehearing en banc, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow defense counsel to question a witness about pending charges.

Read More »

Perry v. Perry

Summarily affirm: The evidence is sufficient to support the trial court's decision awarding husband a divorce on the ground of a one-year separation.

Read More »

Abshire v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient to prove appellant's conduct was deliberate, willful, and so gross and wanton as to show a reckless disregard for human life.

Read More »

Holohan v. Holohan

The trial court did not err in the amount of its award of spousal support to wife, in determining the child support award, and in its denial of attorney's fees to wife

Read More »

Ash v. Ash

Appellant failed to meet her burden to overcome the presumption that the severance package was entirely husband's separate property

Read More »

Reeves v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant failed to prove an irregularity in the impaneling of the jury panel, the trial court did not err in denying his motion for a new trial.

Read More »

McDonald v. Minton

Summarily affirmance: No error in the award of attorney's fees to appellee;case remanded to determine proper amount of the award

Read More »
Scroll To Top