Home / Fulltext Opinions (page 422)

Fulltext Opinions

Feed Subscription

LEWIS v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in failing to grant mistrial or in overruling objection to improper impeachment testimony; one count of attempted robbery is reversed and dismissed as evidence not sufficient to sustain conviction

Read More »

Nelson v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court's discretion in ordering, as a condition of probation, that appellant not operate motor vehicle for twenty years

Read More »

Wilson v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court's refusal to allow appellant to withdraw his Alford pleas to second-degree murder, malicious wounding and use of a firearm in commission of murder

Read More »

MYERS v. COMMONWEALTH

The trial court erred in finding the evidence sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt to convict appellant of grand larceny and possession of a firearm by a felon; conviction reversed and dismissed.

Read More »

G.M.W. General Contractors, Inc., et al. v. Sheffield

Summarily affirmance: No reversible error in finding that claimant proved he sustained neck and back injuries casually related to his compensable May 23, 2001 injury by accident, and that employer was responsible for payment of medical bills for treatment rendered to claimant.

Read More »

Long v. Holt-Tilman

The trial court found that the evidence failed to show that K.L.'s best interests would be served at the time by a return of custody to appellants. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to return physical custody to the appellant's.

Read More »

STROUT v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

The Court cannot harmonize the local and state provisions because the Virginia Beach ordinance establishes a penalty, which exceeds the penalty "prescribed by general law for" the "like" offense; conviction reversed.

Read More »

Elliott v. Elliott

Summarily affirmance: No abuse of discretion in the judge's custody determination. The record demonstrates that the trial judge carefully weighed the evidence, considered the factors set forth in Code § 20-124.3, as required by Code § 20-124.2, and made extensive findings; the parties request for costs and attorney's fees is denied.

Read More »

NISBET v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

The Court cannot harmonize the local and state provisions because the Virginia Beach ordinance establishes a penalty, which exceeds the penalty "prescribed by general law for" the "like" offense; conviction reversed.

Read More »

ALLMAN v. COMMONWEALTH

The evidence was insufficient to prove his language was obscene, reversing and dismissing his conviction without considering whether he acted with intent to harass.

Read More »

Thornton v. Philip Morris USA, et al.

Summarily affirmance: No reversible error in denying claimant's claim for benefits, and finding that she failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out of her employment on September 10, 2002.

Read More »

Smith v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant offered no evidence that the Commissioner violated his statutory duty to mail the revocation notice, habitual offender conviction affirmed.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. Mayfield

The court's ruling constituted a finding that defendant was seized without reasonable suspicion and that this illegal seizure tainted defendant's consent to search. Because the evidence supports such a ruling, case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Read More »

SAWYER v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence supports the trial court's conclusion that appellant failed to prove she was physically unable to submit to a breath test. In the absence of such proof, appellant was not entitled to a blood test.

Read More »

Buxton v. Murch

The actual expenses incurred by the Appellees in enforcing the contempt citation against the Appellants, including the costs for attonrye's fees in defending the Appellants' appeal of the contempt citation, are part of the damages suffered as a result of the contempt and may be included by the trial court as part of the sanctions.

Read More »

Nelson v. COMMONWEALTH

The record supports the trial court's conclusion that no reasonable doubt existed as to the impartiality of the remaining jurors not struck for cause and, thus, that the denial of appellant's mistrial motion did not constitute manifest error.

Read More »

SLADE v. COMMONWEALTH

The totality of the circumstances provided the magistrate with a substantial basis to find the probable cause justified the search.

Read More »

Porter v. Department of Human Resource Management, et al.

Summarily affirmance: Appellant was provided an opportunity to respond to the charges and did so in conjunction with the investigation conducted by NSU's human resources department. She was afforded further opportunity to respond to the allegations through the grievance process of which she availed herself.

Read More »

Hoffman v. Hoffman

No trial court error in its classification of appellant's investment account as marital property; its classification of the marital residence as wife's separate property; and its distribution of the marital estate.

Read More »

Hoffman v. Hoffman (52932)

No trial court error in failing to award appellant spousal support; not reserving for her a right to future spousal support; admitting into evidence the probate file of husband's father; admitting audiotapes of her arguments with husband, and not awarding her attorney's fees.

Read More »
Scroll To Top