Home / Fulltext Opinions / Virginia Court of Appeals (page 193)

Virginia Court of Appeals

Deecheandia v. COMMONWEALTH

The evidence supported the trial court's inference that appellant believed he was corresponding via the internet, and thus attempting to expose himself to, a child.

Read More »

SMITH v. SMITH

The court erred in refusing to enforce the prenuptial agreement, but finding no fault with the court's distribution of the martial home or award of fees.

Read More »

HUDGINS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant's acquittal on the robbery indictment acted as an acquittal of the lesser-included offense of larceny and the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the subsequent attempt to convict appellant of grand larceny from the person.

Read More »

EMERSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence presented is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed the cocaine with the requisite intent to distribute it.

Read More »

Nelson v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court's discretion in ordering, as a condition of probation, that appellant not operate motor vehicle for twenty years

Read More »

Wilson v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court's refusal to allow appellant to withdraw his Alford pleas to second-degree murder, malicious wounding and use of a firearm in commission of murder

Read More »

Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Dept. of Social Services, etc.

Trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain appeal of registration and confirmation of child support orders when appellant failed to post an appeal bond on appeal from juvenile and domestic relations district court; judgment vacated and juvenile court order reinstated

Read More »

ARTIS v. OTTENBERG'S BAKERS, INC. et al.

Error in decision of commission denying appellant's claim for post- termination disability benefits; matter remanded to commission to calculate amount of benefits

Read More »

BREEDEN v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding evidence sufficient to support convictions or in admitting witness' recent complaints of rape

Read More »

LEWIS v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in failing to grant mistrial or in overruling objection to improper impeachment testimony; one count of attempted robbery is reversed and dismissed as evidence not sufficient to sustain conviction

Read More »

Bowling/Ted Bowling Construction v. Creel

Summary affirmance; no error in finding employer failed to sustain burden of proving it did not have three or more employees regularly in service and not subject to Workers' Compensation Act

Read More »

MCKNIGHT v. WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATES AND TRAVELERS

No error in decision of commission finding employer entitled to an offset against its future workers' compensation liability for amount of appellant's recovery from a third party tortfeasor

Read More »

ALLMAN v. COMMONWEALTH

The evidence was insufficient to prove his language was obscene, reversing and dismissing his conviction without considering whether he acted with intent to harass.

Read More »

Thornton v. Philip Morris USA, et al.

Summarily affirmance: No reversible error in denying claimant's claim for benefits, and finding that she failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out of her employment on September 10, 2002.

Read More »

MYERS v. COMMONWEALTH

The trial court erred in finding the evidence sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt to convict appellant of grand larceny and possession of a firearm by a felon; conviction reversed and dismissed.

Read More »

Case v. Case

Summarily affirm: No error in the trial court''s final divorce decree.

Read More »

Featherstone v. Division of Social Services of The City of Danville

Summarily affirmance: The record supports the trial court's finding that DSS presented clear and convincing evidence satisfying the statutory requirements of Code § 16.1-283(C)(2) and establishing that the termination of appellant's residual parental rights was in the child's best interest.

Read More »

G.M.W. General Contractors, Inc., et al. v. Sheffield

Summarily affirmance: No reversible error in finding that claimant proved he sustained neck and back injuries casually related to his compensable May 23, 2001 injury by accident, and that employer was responsible for payment of medical bills for treatment rendered to claimant.

Read More »

Elliott v. Elliott

Summarily affirmance: No abuse of discretion in the judge's custody determination. The record demonstrates that the trial judge carefully weighed the evidence, considered the factors set forth in Code § 20-124.3, as required by Code § 20-124.2, and made extensive findings; the parties request for costs and attorney's fees is denied.

Read More »

Long v. Holt-Tilman

The trial court found that the evidence failed to show that K.L.'s best interests would be served at the time by a return of custody to appellants. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to return physical custody to the appellant's.

Read More »

STROUT v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

The Court cannot harmonize the local and state provisions because the Virginia Beach ordinance establishes a penalty, which exceeds the penalty "prescribed by general law for" the "like" offense; conviction reversed.

Read More »

NISBET v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

The Court cannot harmonize the local and state provisions because the Virginia Beach ordinance establishes a penalty, which exceeds the penalty "prescribed by general law for" the "like" offense; conviction reversed.

Read More »

BOYD v. PEOPLE, INC., et al.

The Commission's determination that employer's application did not violate Commission Rule 1.4 was not in error.

Read More »

SLADE v. COMMONWEALTH

The totality of the circumstances provided the magistrate with a substantial basis to find the probable cause justified the search.

Read More »

CUSTALOW v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence sufficient, appellant was properly excluded from the reservation, trespassing conviction affirmed.

Read More »

Porter v. Department of Human Resource Management, et al.

Summarily affirmance: Appellant was provided an opportunity to respond to the charges and did so in conjunction with the investigation conducted by NSU's human resources department. She was afforded further opportunity to respond to the allegations through the grievance process of which she availed herself.

Read More »

Smith v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant offered no evidence that the Commissioner violated his statutory duty to mail the revocation notice, habitual offender conviction affirmed.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. Mayfield

The court's ruling constituted a finding that defendant was seized without reasonable suspicion and that this illegal seizure tainted defendant's consent to search. Because the evidence supports such a ruling, case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Read More »