Home / Fulltext Opinions / Virginia Court of Appeals (page 195)

Virginia Court of Appeals

MATTHEWS v. MATTHEWS

Trial court did not err in its classification or distribution of proceeds obtained from settlement with manufacturer of recreational vehicle purchased during marriage

Read More »

REESE v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court's instruction to jury on use of a firearm in commission of malicious wounding when underlying felony charged was unlawful wounding and refusal to instruct jury that mandatory sentences on firearm convictions must run consecutively to other sentences

Read More »

HARDIN v. COMMONWEALTH

Court finds that as officers did not have probable cause to arrest appellant, trial court erred in denying motion to suppress

Read More »

ROBB v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient for trial court to conclude that appellant had actual notice that he had been declared an habitual offender and could not lawfully drive

Read More »

ROSE v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court's decision to allow the Commonwealth to adduce the evidence of a prior robbery committed by appellant

Read More »

YOPP v. HODGES

Court finds that appellant's failure to serve guardian ad litem is not fatal in this case as Hughes is disinguishable; Court finds on merits that trial court did not err in awarding visitation to maternal grandparents

Read More »

MAY v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient, as a matter of law, to establish that appellant intended to injure the victims and supported his convictions of assault & battery and assault & battery of a police officer

Read More »

DRISKILL v. DRISKILL

No error in trial court's finding that wife was not underemployed and award of spousal support to wife

Read More »

BALDWIN v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant's convictions affirmed as trial judge had authority to enter order staying and suspending imposition of sentences and had authority to grant relief sought if trial judge found evidence warranted relief

Read More »

EMBERTON v. WHITE SUPPLY & GLASS COMPANY, et al.

No error in decision of commission awarding employer a credit against a hospital bill incurred by appellant prior to third-party recovery but not paid at time of third-party recovery

Read More »

MANOLA v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

Summarily affirm: No reversible error in finding that claimant failed to prove the medical treatment received was reasonable and necessary.

Read More »

LOPEZ v. LOPEZ

For the purposes of determining spousal support the trial court erred in considering wife's inheritance as income. Remand for reconsideration of spousal support award.

Read More »

THOMAS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant lacked an expectation of privacy at the time and place of the search, no error in the denial to suppress evidence seized.

Read More »

PERDUE FARMS, INC. v. THOMAS

Credible evidence supports claimant's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was causally related to his compensable injury.

Read More »

ENGLISH v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant falsely assumed or pretended to be a law enforcement officer and violated Code § 18.2-174.

Read More »

MUSE v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence presented was sufficient to support conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.

Read More »

DAN RIVER, INC. v. ALDERSON

Summarily affirm: No reversible error, employer responsible for certain medical expenses incurred by claimant.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. BRYANT

Reversing the judgment of the trial court, the stop for the purpose of obtaining information was reasonable.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. ERMIAS

The police officer had reasonable suspicion to search the vehicle; trial court?s decision reversed and case remanded for further proceedings.

Read More »

WEST v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in convicting appellant of driving under the influence, involuntary manslaughter, and aggravated involuntary manslaughter.

Read More »

EDMONDS v. COMMONWEALTH

Because the trial court did not indicate that it was taking judicial notice of the fact that the warrant gave appellant notice of the hearing, it deprived her of the "opportunity to be heard either to dispute the 'fact' or to object to the court's action."

Read More »