Don't Miss
Home / Uncategorized (page 18)

Uncategorized

Feed Subscription

CORBIN v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of carjacking, abduction, and robbery where testimony of victim was not inherently incredible or unworthy of belief; trial court did not err in refusing to set aside jury verdicts where jury acquitted appellant of use of a firearm in commission of robbery

Read More »

LAYUG v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in admitting evidence of appellant?s accomplice?s subsequent killing where appellant challenged Commonwealth?s identification of him as one of perpetrators and the evidence of accomplice?s death tended to prove appellant?s identity

Read More »

CASTILLOUX v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding evidence sufficient to prove appellant intentionally possessed cocaine found in his pants pocket; Commonwealth?s opinion as to sufficiency of evidence not binding on trial judge as fact finder

Read More »

TERRY WILLIAM CORBIN v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of carjacking, abduction, and robbery where testimony of victim was not inherently incredible or unworthy of belief; trial court did not err in refusing to set aside jury verdicts where jury acquitted appellant of use of a firearm in commission of robbery

Read More »

FAIRFAX HOSPITAL v. MCKAVENEY

Commission did not err in refusing to award a credit against workers? compensation liability owed appellee where evidence did not prove allowances made to appellee by ?employer? were truly a substitute for payment of wages

Read More »

FELIPE LAYUG, III v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Trial court did not err in admitting evidence of appellant?s accomplice?s subsequent killing where appellant challenged Commonwealth?s identification of him as one of perpetrators and the evidence of accomplice?s death tended to prove appellant?s identity

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. BEYENE

Trial court erred in holding that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which appellant was a passenger where officer observed vehicle speeding and following too closely; officer?s subjective motivation irrevelant

Read More »

KEITH v. ROANOKE CITY

Trial court did not err in finding clear and convincing evidence proved circumstances required for termination of parental rights

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. NAHOM F. BEYENE

Trial court erred in holding that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which appellant was a passenger where officer observed vehicle speeding and following too closely; officer?s subjective motivation irrevelant

Read More »

AFGD GLASS v. HEATH

Summary affirmance ? no error in commission?s finding that appellee proved he sustained a traumatic brain injury and that he reasonably marketed his residual work capacity

Read More »

MANPOWER INC. v. GODFREY

Summary affirmance ? no error in commission?s finding that appellee proved she sustained permanent partial disability within the applicable statute of limitations and awarding benefits for specified loss of use

Read More »

DRAKEFORD v. DRAKEFORD

Trial court erred in adopting appellee?s written statement of facts without allowing appellant adequate opportunity to file objections under Rule 5A:8; matter remanded to trial court for a proper statement of facts

Read More »

WYSOCKI v. HENRICO COUNTY

No error in trial court?s termination of appellant?s parental rights to his children where evidence showed reasonable and appropriate services were provided to him and it was in children?s best interest to terminate his parental rights

Read More »

TURMAN v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in allowing victim to testify as to content of appellant?s instant message to her; trial court did not err in granting Commonwealth?s proposed jury instruction on flight

Read More »

FRANKLIN v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding evidence sufficient to support appellant?s convictions of two felony and two misdemeanor counts of embezzlement

Read More »

WALTER H.C. DRAKEFORD v. LISA M. DRAKEFORD

Trial court erred in adopting appellee?s written statement of facts without allowing appellant adequate opportunity to file objections under Rule 5A:8; matter remanded to trial court for a proper statement of facts

Read More »

MORIN v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient to support appellant?s conviction of driving under the influence under both subsection (i) and (ii) of Code § 18.2-266

Read More »

NELSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient to support conviction of failure to appear as jury could infer appellant?s failure to appear was willful where appellant provided false identification when arrested, violated conditions of bond by traveling to another state, getting arrested in that state, and failed to notify Virginia authorities of his incarceration

Read More »
Scroll To Top