Home / Uncategorized (page 33)

Uncategorized

Feed Subscription

ITT INDUSTRIES v. TAYLOR

No error in commission?s finding that appellee suffered a psychological disability as a compensable consequence of a work-related injury; commission?s award is affirmed

Read More »

STEWART v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction of driving while intoxicated third offense within a ten-year period is reversed as the Commonwealth failed to prove that appellant was previously convicted of a second offense of driving while intoxicated; conviction is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing

Read More »

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH

Upon rehearing en banc, trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress the firearm seized by police as the officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by conducting a protective sweep of the apartment; appellant?s conviction is affirmed

Read More »

FORD v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court?s revocation of appellant?s suspended sentences as appellant agreed to the procedure the trial court adopted

Read More »

DIANE BARKER, F/K/A DIANE HUTSON-WILEY v. JAMES HUTSON-WILEY

Trial court did not err in denying the admission of parol evidence to establish the meaning and intent of ambiguous language in the property settlement agreement and in holding that husband?s spousal support obligation terminated upon wife?s remarriage, pursuant to Code Section 20-109(D)

Read More »

WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH

Upon rehearing en banc, trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress the firearm seized by police as the officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by conducting a protective sweep of the apartment; appellant?s conviction is affirmed

Read More »

TRAVIS PRIEST v. DEANNA CREDLE (122929)

This Court holds that the trial court applied the correct standard in determining the best interests of the children and that there was sufficient evidence to support such a determination; trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying father?s motion to amend visitation, and in awarding mother primary physical custody of the children

Read More »

NEEL v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction of leaving the scene of an accident involving personal injury is reversed and the indictment is dismissed as the evidence failed to prove appellant knew or should have known personal injury had resulted from the collision at the time he fled the scene

Read More »

SHEILA MICHELLE STOKES v. COMMONWEALTH

This Court holds no variance exists between the language of the indictment and the evidence introduced at trial as to the victim; trial court did not err in admitting affidavits of forgery under the business records exception to the hearsay rule; evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of grand larceny

Read More »

SANDHIR v. AHUJA-SANDHIR

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in imputing income to appellant for purposes of determining spousal support and in denying appellant?s request for spousal support; remaining issue is barred by Rule 5A:18

Read More »

ARTHUR C. PARMANN v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the testimony as the witness testified within the scope of his training and expertise as an operator of the testing equipment; judgment affirmed

Read More »

CROZIER v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress evidence obtained by police upon stopping his vehicle as the officer?s reasonable suspicion justified his stopping appellant for investigation

Read More »

STOKES v. COMMONWEALTH

This Court holds no variance exists between the language of the indictment and the evidence introduced at trial as to the victim; trial court did not err in admitting affidavits of forgery under the business records exception to the hearsay rule; evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of grand larceny

Read More »

DAVID PAUL COTE v. SUSAN REDFIELD COTE

Trial court did not err in finding husband responsible for $100,000 in debt incurred prior to the parties? final separation, in awarding husband only forty percent of wife?s retirement account, and in awarding wife spousal support

Read More »

MATTHEWS v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court?s denial of appellant? motion to suppress the cocaine as police had reasonable suspicion that appellant was engaged in criminal activity

Read More »

JESSIE WAYNE ABELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court erred in finding the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant willfully failed to appear; appellant?s conviction of felony failure to appear is reversed and the indictment is dismissed

Read More »

FUTRELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in convicting appellant of attempted rape as the evidence was sufficient to support both the finding of the requisite intent and a finding that appellant committed an overt act in furtherance of the crime

Read More »

POWELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction for driving with a revoked license while a habitual offender is affirmed as appellant did not show that the underlying order adjudicating him as a habitual offender was void

Read More »

PONGO v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction of a felony third offense of driving while intoxicated is affirmed as the evidence is sufficient to demonstrate appellant was represented by counsel at a predicate conviction

Read More »

MASSENGALE v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict appellant of uttering as the Commonwealth established that appellant had actual knowledge that he was uttering a forged document

Read More »

MICHAEL RICARDO MAGRUDER v. COMMONWEALTH

For the reasons set forth in Brooks v. Commonwealth, trial court did not err in admitting the certificate of analysis without requiring the testimony of the person who performed the analysis; appellant?s conviction is affirmed

Read More »

PHILLIPS v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress as appellant?s statements did not amount to an unequivocal assertion of his right to counsel

Read More »

AJAI KUMAR SANDHIR v. NEETA AHUJA-SANDHIR

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in imputing income to appellant for purposes of determining spousal support and in denying appellant?s request for spousal support; remaining issue is barred by Rule 5A:18

Read More »

WOOTEN v. COUNTY OF HENRICO

Trial court erred in finding that the Department of Social Services proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of appellant?s parental rights was in her child?s best interest; trial court?s decision terminating appellant?s parental rights is reversed and the case is remanded

Read More »

PARMANN v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the testimony as the witness testified within the scope of his training and expertise as an operator of the testing equipment; judgment affirmed

Read More »
Scroll To Top