Home / Uncategorized (page 34)

Uncategorized

Feed Subscription

CROZIER v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress evidence obtained by police upon stopping his vehicle as the officer?s reasonable suspicion justified his stopping appellant for investigation

Read More »

STOKES v. COMMONWEALTH

This Court holds no variance exists between the language of the indictment and the evidence introduced at trial as to the victim; trial court did not err in admitting affidavits of forgery under the business records exception to the hearsay rule; evidence was sufficient to convict appellant of grand larceny

Read More »

DAVID PAUL COTE v. SUSAN REDFIELD COTE

Trial court did not err in finding husband responsible for $100,000 in debt incurred prior to the parties? final separation, in awarding husband only forty percent of wife?s retirement account, and in awarding wife spousal support

Read More »

MATTHEWS v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial court?s denial of appellant? motion to suppress the cocaine as police had reasonable suspicion that appellant was engaged in criminal activity

Read More »

JESSIE WAYNE ABELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court erred in finding the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant willfully failed to appear; appellant?s conviction of felony failure to appear is reversed and the indictment is dismissed

Read More »

FUTRELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in convicting appellant of attempted rape as the evidence was sufficient to support both the finding of the requisite intent and a finding that appellant committed an overt act in furtherance of the crime

Read More »

POWELL v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction for driving with a revoked license while a habitual offender is affirmed as appellant did not show that the underlying order adjudicating him as a habitual offender was void

Read More »

PONGO v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction of a felony third offense of driving while intoxicated is affirmed as the evidence is sufficient to demonstrate appellant was represented by counsel at a predicate conviction

Read More »

MASSENGALE v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict appellant of uttering as the Commonwealth established that appellant had actual knowledge that he was uttering a forged document

Read More »

MICHAEL RICARDO MAGRUDER v. COMMONWEALTH

For the reasons set forth in Brooks v. Commonwealth, trial court did not err in admitting the certificate of analysis without requiring the testimony of the person who performed the analysis; appellant?s conviction is affirmed

Read More »

WINSTON v. WARDEN (UNPUBLISHED ORDER)

Upon consideration of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is granted. Petitioner's various claims alleging ineffective assistance of counsel are rejected as not satisfying the two-pronged test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and his remaining claims are rejected as lacking merit or as being either procedurally barred or improperly raised.

Read More »

SPROUSE v. ORANGE COUNTY

No error in trial court?s decision terminating appellant?s residual parental rights to his minor son pursuant to Code Section 16.1-283(C)(1) and 16.1-283(C)(2)

Read More »

DERRICK JAMES WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s convictions are affirmed as this Court holds that the informant?s tip provided the police with the requisite probable cause to arrest appellant and that the police did not need exigent circumstances in addition to probable cause for appellant?s arrest

Read More »

REYES v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in refusing to admit the state of mind testimony and in refusing to admit testimony regarding appellant?s money and jewelry; appellant?s convictions for first-degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony are affirmed

Read More »

COLOCCIA v. COLOCCIA

Trial court?s refusal to set aside the property settlement agreement is affirmed as the evidence supports the trial court?s finding that husband failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he was incompetent when he executed the property settlement agreement

Read More »

ROLAND WILLIAMS, JR. v. COMMONWEALTH

As appellant did not provide a sufficient proffer for this Court to determine whether the trial court erred in refusing to permit the cross-examination questions, appellant?s conviction of armed robbery is affirmed

Read More »

LOWELL F. SMITH v. ALICE L. THORNTON-SMITH

Judgment pertaining to the rulings classifying the Arlington and Berryville properties and the award of attorney?s fees to appellee are affirmed; judgment pertaining to the classification of the Volkswagen is reversed and this matter is remanded to the trial court to reexamine the equitable distribution award

Read More »

JORGE LUIS REYES v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in refusing to admit the state of mind testimony and in refusing to admit testimony regarding appellant?s money and jewelry; appellant?s convictions for first-degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony are affirmed

Read More »

TURNER v. COMMONWEALTH

Circuit court erred in amending the warrant to charge driving under the influence, second or subsequent offense after appellant had been acquitted of that charge in a court of competent jurisdiction; judgment is reversed, appellant?s conviction for DUI second offense is set aside, and the case is remanded for resentencing on the conviction of driving under the influence, first offense

Read More »

WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s convictions are affirmed as this Court holds that the informant?s tip provided the police with the requisite probable cause to arrest appellant and that the police did not need exigent circumstances in addition to probable cause for appellant?s arrest

Read More »

KENNETH WAYNE TURNER v. COMMONWEALTH

Circuit court erred in amending the warrant to charge driving under the influence, second or subsequent offense after appellant had been acquitted of that charge in a court of competent jurisdiction; judgment is reversed, appellant?s conviction for DUI second offense is set aside, and the case is remanded for resentencing on the conviction of driving under the influence, first offense

Read More »

WINKLER v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence sufficient to support appellant?s convictions of two counts of robbery and two counts of using a firearm in the commission of a felony

Read More »

WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH (122760)

As appellant did not provide a sufficient proffer for this Court to determine whether the trial court erred in refusing to permit the cross-examination questions, appellant?s conviction of armed robbery is affirmed

Read More »

SMITH v. THORNTON-SMITH

Judgment pertaining to the rulings classifying the Arlington and Berryville properties and the award of attorney?s fees to appellee are affirmed; judgment pertaining to the classification of the Volkswagen is reversed and this matter is remanded to the trial court to reexamine the equitable distribution award

Read More »

BELTON v. CRUDUP

In rejecting a petition to establish a parent-child relationship with a decedent whose estate is pending, the circuit court did not err in applying the requirements set forth in Code § 64.1-5.1(4) for a child born out of wedlock to share in the distribution of a putative parent?s estate. The sole act of filing a list of heirs identifying petitioner as decedent?s child did not toll the period during which an action seeking adjudication of the existence of the parent-child relationship was required to have been filed, and the petitioner cannot, as a matter of law, share in the settlement of the estate because no such action was commenced within one year of the decedent's death. The judgment is affirmed.

Read More »

W. R. HALL v. HAMPTON ROADS SANITATION DISTRICT

Contractual indemnification provisions are not void as against public policy insofar as they entitle an indemnitee to be reimbursed by an indemnitor for costs and expenses incurred in the defense of a personal injury claim by a third party. Accordingly, the trial court correctly ruled that the indemnity provisions in a construction contract were enforceable. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Read More »

HAMLET v. HAYES

In a suit for specific performance of a shareholders' agreement relating to purchase of shares in a closely held corporation, the trial court erred in sustaining the defendants' demurrers based on the view that, as a matter of law, the plaintiffs' bill of complaint failed to allege the essential elements of a breach of contract suit entitling them to the relief of specific performance. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Read More »

TABOADA v. DALY SEVEN (ORDER) (123157)

Upon considering a petition for rehearing regarding the prior decision of this appeal reported at Taboada v. Daly Seven, Inc., 271 Va. 313, 626 S.E.2d 428 (2006), the Court is of the opinion that its judgment should not be set aside. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendant innkeeper's demurrer to the plaintiff guest's claim under Code &sect; 35.1-28 is affirmed, but its judgment sustaining the innkeeper's demurrer to the guest's common law negligence claim is reversed and the case is remanded for a trial on the merits thereof. (<a href="http://www.courts.state.va.us:80/#051094">See the Opinion, Taboada v. Daly Seven, Inc., dated March 3, 2006</a>)

Read More »

TRUSTEES v. BD. OF ZONING, CITY OF NORFOLK

In a zoning dispute, the circuit court did not err in affirming a zoning administrator's conclusion, upheld by the board of zoning appeals, that the term "adjacent" used in an ordinance provision permitting a zoning lot to be comprised of multiple adjacent lots for purposes of determining maximum buildable area, did not include two of plaintiffs' lots situated across from one another but separated by a public street. This interpretation is neither plainly wrong nor in violation of the purpose and intent of the ordinance as a whole, and correct principles of law were applied in adopting it. The judgment is affirmed.

Read More »

C. GIVENS BROTHERS, L.L.C. v. TOWN OF BLACKSBURG (ORDER)

The circuit court did not err in finding that a limited liability company's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel a municipality's construction of sewer lines to its property, which the municipality had previously annexed, was barred by the statute of limitations. Prior case law does not limit the application of a statute of limitations to such a petition on the basis of the relief sought therein, and since the limited liability company's cause of action accrued, at the latest date, in November of 1985, regardless of which statute of limitations applies in the case at bar, the petition, filed approximately 20 years later, was not timely.

Read More »
Scroll To Top