Home / Uncategorized (page 59)

Uncategorized

Feed Subscription

KEITH ALAN ROSA v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress pictures found on his computer during a search of the computer as the officer acted reasonably in opening the picture files and the deleted files were in plain view

Read More »

BERNARD L. LEWIS v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to strike the evidence and permitting the Commonwealth to reopen its case; appellant?s conviction of possession of cocaine affirmed

Read More »

B. LEWIS v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to strike the evidence and permitting the Commonwealth to reopen its case; appellant?s conviction of possession of cocaine affirmed

Read More »

CARL DOUG NOCE v. LYNN MORELLE CANADA NOCE

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in refusing to award appellant a divorce on the ground of wife?s adultery, in awarding spousal support to wife, and by failing to give husband credit for his post-separation payments towards the second mortgage on the marital residence

Read More »

W. LEWIS v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion in limine to prevent the Commonwealth from introducing evidence of a separate robbery attempt for the purpose of establishing appellant?s identity as the perpetrator of the three robberies for which he was charged

Read More »

KING v. CARROLL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in terminating appellant?s residual parental rights as the department of social services presented clear and convincing evidence satisfying the statutory requirements of Code Section 16.1-283(B), (E)(iii) and (E)(iv) and establishing that the termination of appellant?s residual parental rights was in the best interests of the children

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. DOROTHY VINETTA BRIGGS

Trial court erred in finding that the officers could not ask questions regarding drug paraphernalia without first giving Miranda warnings and that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop; trial court?s decision granting the motion to suppress is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

PRYOR v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in refusing to set aside the abduction conviction and in admitting into evidence the preliminary hearing testimony of appellant?s wife; appellant?s convictions of first-degree murder and abduction are affirmed

Read More »

CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION v. COMMONWEALTH

This Court holds the trial court?s conclusion that Virginia law does not permit representational standing was erroneous and the facts alleged in appellant?s petition for appeal were sufficient to survive the appellees? demurrers; trial court?s dismissal of appellant?s petition for appeal with prejudice is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

GARY ANTHONY PRYOR v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in refusing to set aside the abduction conviction and in admitting into evidence the preliminary hearing testimony of appellant?s wife; appellant?s convictions of first-degree murder and abduction are affirmed

Read More »

GILMAN v. COMMONWEALTH

Circuit court did not err in admitting into evidence a Certificate of Conviction prepared by the juvenile and domestic relations judge as the admission of the certificate pursuant to Code Section 18.2-459 did not implicate appellant?s Confrontation Clause rights

Read More »

CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC. v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ex rel., et al.

This Court holds the trial court?s conclusion that Virginia law does not permit representational standing was erroneous and the facts alleged in appellant?s petition for appeal were sufficient to survive the appellees? demurrers; trial court?s dismissal of appellant?s petition for appeal with prejudice is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

TINA GILMAN, S/K/A TINA M. GILMAN v. COMMONWEALTH

Circuit court did not err in admitting into evidence a Certificate of Conviction prepared by the juvenile and domestic relations judge as the admission of the certificate pursuant to Code Section 18.2-459 did not implicate appellant?s Confrontation Clause rights

Read More »

KING v. CARROLL COUNTY DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in terminating appellant?s residual parental rights as the department of social services presented clear and convincing evidence satisfying the statutory requirements of Code Section 16.1-283(B), (E)(iii) and (E)(iv) and establishing that the termination of appellant?s residual parental rights was in the best interests of the children

Read More »

TONY L. KING v. CARROLL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES (119847)

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in terminating appellant?s residual parental rights as the department of social services presented clear and convincing evidence satisfying the statutory requirements of Code Section 16.1-283(B), (E)(iii) and (E)(iv) and establishing that the termination of appellant?s residual parental rights was in the best interests of the children

Read More »

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY v. HOLMES

No error in commission?s decision holding that employer had not paid claimant 500 weeks of wage loss compensation benefits pursuant to an award under the Virginia Workers? Compensation Act as employer?s payments to claimant under the federal LHWCA were voluntary and could not be taken into account when calculating the total amount of claimant?s compensation benefits under the Virginia Act

Read More »

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY v. MARY GERTRUDE HOLMES

No error in commission?s decision holding that employer had not paid claimant 500 weeks of wage loss compensation benefits pursuant to an award under the Virginia Workers? Compensation Act as employer?s payments to claimant under the federal LHWCA were voluntary and could not be taken into account when calculating the total amount of claimant?s compensation benefits under the Virginia Act

Read More »

SODERSTROM v. MALONEY

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not abuse its discretion by modifying rather than terminating appellee?s award of spousal support

Read More »

TONY L. KING v. CARROLL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES (119849)

Summary affirmance ? trial court did not err in terminating appellant?s residual parental rights as the department of social services presented clear and convincing evidence satisfying the statutory requirements of Code Section 16.1-283(B), (E)(iii) and (E)(iv) and establishing that the termination of appellant?s residual parental rights was in the best interests of the children

Read More »

SPRINT CORPORATION v. BROOKS

Commission did not err in granting appellee permission to return to and resume treatment from her treating physician as res judicata did not bar the commission from considering appellee?s application for ongoing medical treatment and appellee proved her need for continued medical treatment was causally related to her injury by accident

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. BRIGGS

Trial court erred in finding that the officers could not ask questions regarding drug paraphernalia without first giving Miranda warnings and that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop; trial court?s decision granting the motion to suppress is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER v. WARREN

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding appellee proved that his back problems were a compensable consequence of his injury by accident to his right knee injury, his disability was causally related to the injury by accident, and his treatment was employer?s responsibility

Read More »

DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER v. RAYMOND WARREN

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding appellee proved that his back problems were a compensable consequence of his injury by accident to his right knee injury, his disability was causally related to the injury by accident, and his treatment was employer?s responsibility

Read More »

VIRGINIA LINEN SERVICE v. WISE

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding that appellees were not precluded pursuant to Code Section 65.2-306 from recovering benefits under the Workers? Compensation Act based upon the deceased?s alleged willful misconduct in failing to use a safety harness and the ?buddy system?

Read More »

MUHAMMAD v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant?s conviction of possession with the intent to distribute heroin

Read More »

ROMAN v. ONDEO DEGREMONT

Commission erred in denying claimant?s request for imposition of a penalty; this Court holds that where the commission orders an attorney?s fee to be paid out of a claimant?s accrued compensation, the fee remains compensation within the meaning of the penalty statute; commission?s decision is reversed and the matter is remanded

Read More »
Scroll To Top