Home / Uncategorized (page 61)

Uncategorized

Feed Subscription

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. DOROTHY VINETTA BRIGGS

Trial court erred in finding that the officers could not ask questions regarding drug paraphernalia without first giving Miranda warnings and that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop; trial court?s decision granting the motion to suppress is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

Read More »

CLAY v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress a photograph of him taken by a police officer and in admitting evidence of the victim?s identification of him in a pretrial photo lineup

Read More »

WILBUR ALPHONSO CLAY v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to suppress a photograph of him taken by a police officer and in admitting evidence of the victim?s identification of him in a pretrial photo lineup

Read More »

BO JASON TOOKE v. COMMONWEALTH

As appellant was convicted twice for conduct that was but one criminal act, one of appellant?s convictions of felony hit and run is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court to dismiss that indictment; as the evidence was sufficient to prove appellant had actual knowledge of the accident, appellant?s other conviction of felony hit and run is affirmed

Read More »

COKLEY v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in denying appellant?s motion to strike the evidence and in finding him guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute as the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction

Read More »

CHARLES DEANDRE DEVILLE v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial judge?s denial of appellant?s Brady motion as appellant cannot show a reasonable probability that the outcome of his trial would have been different had the evidence been disclosed earlier; appellant?s conviction of conspiring to commit grand larceny by false pretenses is affirmed

Read More »

WILSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing restitution in the amount of $15,000 to the insurance company as the Commonwealth provided sufficient evidence of the actual amount of loss sustained by the insurance company

Read More »

ANTONIO WILSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing restitution in the amount of $15,000 to the insurance company as the Commonwealth provided sufficient evidence of the actual amount of loss sustained by the insurance company

Read More »

BOWEN v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction under Code Section 18.2-308.2 did not violate his constitutional right to due process as appellant failed to prove that his parole officer affirmatively assured him that the conduct that gave rise to his conviction was lawful; trial court did not err in ruling it no longer had jurisdiction to consider appellant?s motion for bond pending appeal

Read More »

TRINELL LORENZO BOWEN v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant?s conviction under Code Section 18.2-308.2 did not violate his constitutional right to due process as appellant failed to prove that his parole officer affirmatively assured him that the conduct that gave rise to his conviction was lawful; trial court did not err in ruling it no longer had jurisdiction to consider appellant?s motion for bond pending appeal

Read More »

LUTES v. VIRGINIA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Trial court did not err in terminating appellant?s residual parental rights to her minor son under Code Section 16.1-283(C)(2) as the department of human services presented clear and convincing evidence that the termination of appellant?s parental rights was in the child?s best interests

Read More »

SUGGS v. SUGGS CARPET INSTALLATION

Commission did not err in allowing employer to reduce payments of claimant?s future compensation and medical benefits pursuant to Code Section 65.2-313, until employer recoups the gross recovery obtained by claimant as a result of a third-party settlement and in finding that employer is not responsible for the cost of a hot tub installed at claimant?s residence

Read More »

ROMAN v. ONDEO DEGREMONT

Commission erred in denying claimant?s request for imposition of a penalty; this Court holds that where the commission orders an attorney?s fee to be paid out of a claimant?s accrued compensation, the fee remains compensation within the meaning of the penalty statute; commission?s decision is reversed and the matter is remanded

Read More »

BAYNE v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in the trial court?s finding that the evidence was sufficient to prove appellant guilty of improper driving as proscribed by Code Section 46.2-869

Read More »

TOOKE v. COMMONWEALTH

As appellant was convicted twice for conduct that was but one criminal act, one of appellant?s convictions of felony hit and run is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court to dismiss that indictment; as the evidence was sufficient to prove appellant had actual knowledge of the accident, appellant?s other conviction of felony hit and run is affirmed

Read More »

COLEMAN v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding the evidence sufficient to prove appellant constructively possessed cocaine; appellant?s conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed

Read More »

DEVILLE v. COMMONWEALTH

No error in trial judge?s denial of appellant?s Brady motion as appellant cannot show a reasonable probability that the outcome of his trial would have been different had the evidence been disclosed earlier; appellant?s conviction of conspiring to commit grand larceny by false pretenses is affirmed

Read More »

DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER v. WARREN

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding appellee proved that his back problems were a compensable consequence of his injury by accident to his right knee injury, his disability was causally related to the injury by accident, and his treatment was employer?s responsibility

Read More »

DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER v. RAYMOND WARREN

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding appellee proved that his back problems were a compensable consequence of his injury by accident to his right knee injury, his disability was causally related to the injury by accident, and his treatment was employer?s responsibility

Read More »

VIRGINIA LINEN SERVICE v. WISE

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding that appellees were not precluded pursuant to Code Section 65.2-306 from recovering benefits under the Workers? Compensation Act based upon the deceased?s alleged willful misconduct in failing to use a safety harness and the ?buddy system?

Read More »

MUHAMMAD v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in finding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant?s conviction of possession with the intent to distribute heroin

Read More »

JACKSON (JERRY T.) v. WARDEN (ORDER)

Upon consideration of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is granted. Petitioner's various claims alleging ineffective assistance of counsel are rejected as not satisfying the two-pronged test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and his remaining claims are rejected as lacking merit or as being either procedurally barred or improperly raised.

Read More »

JAMES EDWIN MCKINNON v. MICHELLE ATKINSON WOOD MCKINNON

Trial court?s decision to accept the commissioner?s factual finding rejecting appellee?s dissipation claim and his recommendation against an award of attorney?s fees to appellee affirmed; trial court?s decision to adopt the commissioner?s recommendation to treat the ?Fidelity New Millennium Fund? as marital property subject to an equitable distribution award reversed and matter remanded

Read More »

MCKINNON v. MCKINNON

Trial court?s decision to accept the commissioner?s factual finding rejecting appellee?s dissipation claim and his recommendation against an award of attorney?s fees to appellee affirmed; trial court?s decision to adopt the commissioner?s recommendation to treat the ?Fidelity New Millennium Fund? as marital property subject to an equitable distribution award reversed and matter remanded

Read More »

CVS VIRGINIA DISTRIBUTION v. OWENS

Summary affirmance ? commission did not err in finding that claimant proved that her disability and medical treatment were causally related to her compensable injury by accident and that she was totally disabled

Read More »

SCOTT v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Appellants? failure to challenge the terminations of their parental rights under Code Section 16.1-283(C) and (E) renders moot their claims regarding the terminations under Code Section 16.1-283(B); trial court?s decisions to terminate appellants? parental rights are affirmed

Read More »
Scroll To Top