Don't Miss
Home / Fulltext Opinions / Virginia Court of Appeals (page 177)

Virginia Court of Appeals

Feed Subscription

Feldman v. Feldman

As spousal support must be determined before child support obligation is determined, judgment of trial court is reversed and appellee's petition to modify spousal support is dismissed.

Read More »

Floyd County School Board, et al v. Woolwine

Summary affirmance: No error in commission's decision finding appellee's condition and treatment are related to injury by accident, naming his authorized treating physicians and making any referrals by those physicians employer's responsiblity.

Read More »

McNeese v. Taylor

Summarily affirm the decision of the trial court;remand the case for a determination of husband's attorney's fees and costs incident to this appeal.

Read More »

Bragg v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence supports the trial court's finding that appellant entertained a separate and distinct intent to commit the various acts of embezzlement.

Read More »

Finnerty v. Thornton Hall, Inc.

The trial court, therefore, correctly found that DMAS failed to make its initial determinations within the four-year limitation period set forth in Code § 32.1-325.1:1(B).

Read More »

Aylor v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant waived his argument by submitting the "weapon" issue to the jury and then expressly conceding the sufficiency of the evidence on this issue, we affirm.

Read More »

Norfolk Division of Social Services v. Hardy

No error in the trial court's determination that the best interest of the children would be served by not terminating mother's parental rights, and by allowing them to stay in the stable environment of foster care,is supported by the evidence.

Read More »

Yarborough v. COMMONWEALTH

The jury was properly instructed on the use of prior inconsistent statements at the close of all the evidence, we affirm appellant's conviction and remand for correction of the clerical error.

Read More »

Kay v. City of Norfolk

Summary affirmance: No error in denial of claim for benefits as appellant failed to prove she sustained injury by accident arising out of employment.

Read More »

Newman v. Newman

Upon Rehearing En Banc no error in denying husband's "Motion to Eliminate and/or Reduce" his contractual obligation to pay spousal support.

Read More »

Hardy v. Hardy

No error in the trial court's determination that the best interest of the children would be served by not terminating mother's parental rights, and by allowing them to stay in the stable environment of foster care,is supported by the evidence.

Read More »
Scroll To Top