Home / Fulltext Opinions / Virginia Court of Appeals (page 192)

Virginia Court of Appeals

BALDWIN v. COMMONWEALTH (55538)

Appellant's convictions affirmed as trial judge had authority to enter order staying and suspending imposition of sentences and had authority to grant relief sought if trial judge found evidence warranted relief

Read More »

HUGHES v. CW

Evidence is sufficient to support jury's finding of guilt; trial court did not err in rejecting appellants' self-defense instructions

Read More »

ROBINSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence was sufficient to prove conviction of abduction for pecuniary benefit and that element of force and intimidation was present

Read More »

THOMAS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant lacked an expectation of privacy at the time and place of the search, no error in the denial to suppress evidence seized.

Read More »

PERDUE FARMS, INC. v. THOMAS

Credible evidence supports claimant's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was causally related to his compensable injury.

Read More »

MANOLA v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

Summarily affirm: No reversible error in finding that claimant failed to prove the medical treatment received was reasonable and necessary.

Read More »

LOPEZ v. LOPEZ

For the purposes of determining spousal support the trial court erred in considering wife's inheritance as income. Remand for reconsideration of spousal support award.

Read More »

MUSE v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence presented was sufficient to support conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.

Read More »

DAN RIVER, INC. v. ALDERSON

Summarily affirm: No reversible error, employer responsible for certain medical expenses incurred by claimant.

Read More »

ENGLISH v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant falsely assumed or pretended to be a law enforcement officer and violated Code § 18.2-174.

Read More »

WEST v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in convicting appellant of driving under the influence, involuntary manslaughter, and aggravated involuntary manslaughter.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. ERMIAS

The police officer had reasonable suspicion to search the vehicle; trial court?s decision reversed and case remanded for further proceedings.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. BRYANT

Reversing the judgment of the trial court, the stop for the purpose of obtaining information was reasonable.

Read More »

Deecheandia v. COMMONWEALTH

The evidence supported the trial court's inference that appellant believed he was corresponding via the internet, and thus attempting to expose himself to, a child.

Read More »

SMITH v. SMITH

The court erred in refusing to enforce the prenuptial agreement, but finding no fault with the court's distribution of the martial home or award of fees.

Read More »

EMERSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence presented is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed the cocaine with the requisite intent to distribute it.

Read More »

HUDGINS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant's acquittal on the robbery indictment acted as an acquittal of the lesser-included offense of larceny and the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the subsequent attempt to convict appellant of grand larceny from the person.

Read More »