Home / Fulltext Opinions / Virginia Court of Appeals (page 196)

Virginia Court of Appeals

PERDUE FARMS, INC. v. THOMAS

Credible evidence supports claimant's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was causally related to his compensable injury.

Read More »

MANOLA v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

Summarily affirm: No reversible error in finding that claimant failed to prove the medical treatment received was reasonable and necessary.

Read More »

LOPEZ v. LOPEZ

For the purposes of determining spousal support the trial court erred in considering wife's inheritance as income. Remand for reconsideration of spousal support award.

Read More »

MUSE v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence presented was sufficient to support conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.

Read More »

DAN RIVER, INC. v. ALDERSON

Summarily affirm: No reversible error, employer responsible for certain medical expenses incurred by claimant.

Read More »

ENGLISH v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant falsely assumed or pretended to be a law enforcement officer and violated Code § 18.2-174.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. BRYANT

Reversing the judgment of the trial court, the stop for the purpose of obtaining information was reasonable.

Read More »

COMMONWEALTH v. ERMIAS

The police officer had reasonable suspicion to search the vehicle; trial court?s decision reversed and case remanded for further proceedings.

Read More »

WEST v. COMMONWEALTH

Trial court did not err in convicting appellant of driving under the influence, involuntary manslaughter, and aggravated involuntary manslaughter.

Read More »

Deecheandia v. COMMONWEALTH

The evidence supported the trial court's inference that appellant believed he was corresponding via the internet, and thus attempting to expose himself to, a child.

Read More »

SMITH v. SMITH

The court erred in refusing to enforce the prenuptial agreement, but finding no fault with the court's distribution of the martial home or award of fees.

Read More »

HUDGINS v. COMMONWEALTH

Appellant's acquittal on the robbery indictment acted as an acquittal of the lesser-included offense of larceny and the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the subsequent attempt to convict appellant of grand larceny from the person.

Read More »

EMERSON v. COMMONWEALTH

Evidence presented is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed the cocaine with the requisite intent to distribute it.

Read More »

CARWLEY v. FORD

Without evidence, or a proper record of proceedings during which the agreement was made, this Court simply cannot conduct an examination of the circumstances in order to determine whether the trial court erred.

Read More »

PEARSON v. COMMONWEALTH

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the certificate of blood analysis into evidence.

Read More »

Johnson v. Johnson

The trail court determined that husband did not meet his burden of proof and accordingly denied his motion to abate spousal support.

Read More »