<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Danville Circuit Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/danville-circuit-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:27:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiff gets hospital report, under old or new privilege statute&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/03/plaintiff-gets-hospital-report-under-old-or-new-privilege-statute/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/03/plaintiff-gets-hospital-report-under-old-or-new-privilege-statute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David A. Melesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=62960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Danville Circuit Court has given a plaintiff access to a hospital incident report that his lawyer thought could shed light on what happened when an infant was injured during a circumcision. The hospital tried to protect the information by claiming the report was privileged under Virginia Code § 8.01-581.17. The hospital argued that a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/03/plaintiff-gets-hospital-report-under-old-or-new-privilege-statute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiff Gets Hospital Incident Report&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/03/plaintiff-gets-hospital-incident-report/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/03/plaintiff-gets-hospital-incident-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 15:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David A. Melesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=62958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Danville Circuit Court says Danville Regional Medical Center must turn over to plaintiff an incident report that has factual information not protected by Va. Code § 8.01-581.17; the document here falls under iiiRiverside Hospital v. Johnson,iii and even viewing plaintiff’s request under the 2011 amendment to Code § 8.01-581.17, plaintiff can have discovery of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/03/plaintiff-gets-hospital-incident-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passenger should have known driver was drunk, defense alleges &#8211; $125,000 Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/03/28/passenger-should-have-known-driver-was-drunk-defense-alleges-125000-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/03/28/passenger-should-have-known-driver-was-drunk-defense-alleges-125000-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David A. Melesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=61608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiff, a 19-year-old student, was a passenger in the back seat of defendant’s vehicle. Defendant and another passenger had been drinking prior to picking up the plaintiff. Defendant drove 15 or more miles on back roads to pick up the plaintiff and drove back without any problems. Defendant stopped and got gas just prior to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/03/28/passenger-should-have-known-driver-was-drunk-defense-alleges-125000-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
