<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rule changes would deal with discovery&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/10/rule-changes-would-deal-with-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/10/rule-changes-would-deal-with-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy E. Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers are concerned that discovery is getting out of hand. The masses of data that are part of everyday operations in modern organizations are generating ever-more complicated discovery demands, even in simple cases. Responding to concern from litigators nationwide, the U.S. Courts’ Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure recently approved proposed changes to several [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/10/rule-changes-would-deal-with-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit limits winner’s e-discovery cost recovery&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/02/4th-circuit-limits-winners-e-discovery-cost-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/02/4th-circuit-limits-winners-e-discovery-cost-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Andre M. Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech wizards may tell lawyers that e-discovery advances will cut litigation costs, but lawyers know that the more data is out there, the more their opponents want. There may have been some hope for recovery of the costs for production of electronically stored information, or ESI, under the federal taxation-of-costs statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1920(4). [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/02/4th-circuit-limits-winners-e-discovery-cost-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to weigh criminal discovery reform&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/28/supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-discovery-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/28/supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-discovery-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia State Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After nine years of study and open conflict alternating with utter disregard, a proposal to liberalize criminal discovery in Virginia is now before the Virginia Supreme Court. With only three negative votes, the Virginia State Bar council on Feb. 23 sent to the court a recommendation for opening prosecutors’ files that emerged from a VSB-appointed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/28/supreme-court-to-weigh-criminal-discovery-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loudoun judge approves predictive coding results&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/22/loudoun-judge-approves-predictive-coding-results/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/22/loudoun-judge-approves-predictive-coding-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy E. Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James H. Chamblin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first case to approve the use of predictive coding over a party’s objection, a Loudoun Circuit Court judge has signed off on the defense’s computer-assisted review results in a document-heavy case. Computer-assisted review made headlines over the past year after U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck of the Southern District of New York [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/22/loudoun-judge-approves-predictive-coding-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer-assisted review becomes more popular&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/01/computer-assisted-review-becomes-more-popular/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/01/computer-assisted-review-becomes-more-popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy E. Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James H. Chamblin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loudoun County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pace for adoption of predictive coding in discovery is accelerating, say lawyers familiar with using computers for mass document review. One Virginia court was an early adopter. In April 2012, Loudoun Circuit Judge James H. Chamblin issued a two-page order allowing the use of computer-assisted review over the objection of plaintiff’s counsel, in Global [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/01/computer-assisted-review-becomes-more-popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An ‘unzip’ drive: Defense bar pushing new rules for broader access to prosecutors’ files&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/28/an-unzip-drive-defense-bar-pushing-new-rules-for-broader-access-to-prosecutors-files/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/28/an-unzip-drive-defense-bar-pushing-new-rules-for-broader-access-to-prosecutors-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth's Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Defenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia State Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weary of case-by-case skirmishing over discovery, the criminal defense bar has seized the initiative to push for broad change to the rules governing access to prosecutors’ files. Defense lawyers are one step closer to winning wider access to police reports and prosecutors’ files, as new recommendations go before the Virginia State Bar at the end [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/28/an-unzip-drive-defense-bar-pushing-new-rules-for-broader-access-to-prosecutors-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litigation pitfalls and pratfalls&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/10/litigation-pitfalls-and-pratfalls/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/10/litigation-pitfalls-and-pratfalls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richmond Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year in Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers can find plenty of ways to stay out of a courtroom. Instead of the hand-to-hand combat of a trial before judge or jury, they can opt for some form of alternative dispute resolution. But the lure of the courtroom stays strong, for a whole class of litigators and for those who just enjoy stories [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/10/litigation-pitfalls-and-pratfalls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveillance says&#8230;&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/03/surveillance-says/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/03/surveillance-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big Brother is watching, but what happens when Big Brother has to go to court to tell what he saw? That’s the question for lawyers who are increasingly using video from those ever-present security cameras as evidence in legal cases: Video has helped to convict criminal defendants. Security footage has illustrated the impact of traffic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/03/surveillance-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery omissions costly for mine equipment company&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/15/discovery-omissions-costly-for-mine-equipment-company/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/15/discovery-omissions-costly-for-mine-equipment-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge James P. Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A company that failed to produce documents and had two employees who gave false deposition testimony will have to foot the bill as the other side reviews more than 22,000 internal documents. An Abingdon federal judge penalized the company for discovery lapses that its lawyers blamed on the work of temporary contract attorneys hired for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/15/discovery-omissions-costly-for-mine-equipment-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VSB task force proposes criminal discovery reforms&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/05/vsb-task-force-proposes-criminal-discovery-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/05/vsb-task-force-proposes-criminal-discovery-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia State Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A proposal to expand the minimum requirements for discovery in Virginia criminal cases is open for comment at the Virginia State Bar. Many criminal defense lawyers have argued for years prosecutors should have to share more of their information in criminal cases. Many prosecutors say the law is adequate as it is. The changes offered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/05/vsb-task-force-proposes-criminal-discovery-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
