<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Floyd County Circuit Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/floyd-county-circuit-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Agency Decision on Dam Upheld Under NEPA&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/19/agency-decision-on-dam-upheld-under-nepa/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/19/agency-decision-on-dam-upheld-under-nepa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floyd County Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 4th Circuit upholds a decision by the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service to eliminate from its 35-year-old project for preservation of the Lost River Subwatershed its plan to construct one of five dams, a decision challenged by seven owners who say their land will be adversely affected by this decision; the NRCS has complied [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/19/agency-decision-on-dam-upheld-under-nepa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custody Arbitration Award Overturned&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/custody-arbitration-award-overturned/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/custody-arbitration-award-overturned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floyd County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/custody-arbitration-award-overturned/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Floyd County overturns an arbitration award that required a mother to move from Richmond to a location within 40 miles of father in Floyd County or relinquish custody of her child to father; under Virginia law, the court is not bound by the arbitrator’s decision but is entitled to exercise its statutory duties in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/custody-arbitration-award-overturned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court overrides arbitrator on custody&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/11/court-overrides-arbitrator-on-custody/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/11/court-overrides-arbitrator-on-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fletcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floyd County Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/14/court-overrides-arbitrator-on-custody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A circuit judge is not bound by an arbitrator’s ruling on child custody issues, a Floyd County Circuit judge has ruled. The court has the statutory duty and responsibility to determine the best interest of a child, the judge found. There is “not much law” on this legal point, said Jonathan Rogers of Floyd, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/11/court-overrides-arbitrator-on-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
