<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge A. Bonwill Shockley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-a-bonwill-shockley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patient develops infection after removal of wisdom teeth &#8211; Defense Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/20/patient-develops-infection-after-removal-of-wisdom-teeth-defense-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/20/patient-develops-infection-after-removal-of-wisdom-teeth-defense-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge A. Bonwill Shockley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Defense Verdicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Beach Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/16/patient-develops-infection-after-removal-of-wisdom-teeth-defense-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defendant oral and maxillofacial surgeon extracted two of the plaintiff’s wisdom teeth. Plaintiff alleged that defendant (i) failed to appropriately prescribe antibiotics both before and after the surgery, (ii) failed to detect the signs of an infection during his treatment of her, (iii) failed to timely order a CT or MRI scan or make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/20/patient-develops-infection-after-removal-of-wisdom-teeth-defense-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court opinion leads to settlement of infant’s case &#8211; $796,000 Settlement&#160;&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2009/12/14/supreme-court-opinion-leads-to-settlement-of-infant%e2%80%99s-case-796000-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2009/12/14/supreme-court-opinion-leads-to-settlement-of-infant%e2%80%99s-case-796000-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge A. Bonwill Shockley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Beach Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=50374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Infant plaintiff passenger was ejected from a car that was struck in the rear by defendant. The infant was seriously injured and scarred. Defendant had $296,000 in liability coverage. The major issue in the case was the amount of UIM coverage. This was resolved in a declaratory judgment action ultimately decided by the Virginia Supreme [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2009/12/14/supreme-court-opinion-leads-to-settlement-of-infant%e2%80%99s-case-796000-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
