<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Barbara Milano Keenan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-barbara-milano-keenan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Airport Shuttle Driver Must Arbitrate Claims&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/02/airport-shuttle-driver-must-arbitrate-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/02/airport-shuttle-driver-must-arbitrate-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An arbitration clause in a franchise agreement signed by a driver for an airport shuttle service is not unconscionable because it includes a class action waiver and a requirement to split arbitration fees, and the 4th Circuit vacates the district court decision and remands the case for entry of an order compelling arbitration. Appellant was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/02/airport-shuttle-driver-must-arbitrate-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defendant Missed Three Chances to Amend&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/defendant-missed-three-chances-to-amend/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/defendant-missed-three-chances-to-amend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this trademark infringement case, the defendant waived its affirmative defenses of claim preclusion and issue preclusion by waiting three months to ask to amend its answer to include these defenses, and the district court erred in setting aside the jury verdict for plaintiff and entering judgment for defendant, based on these preclusion defenses; the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/defendant-missed-three-chances-to-amend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investor Not &#8216;Customer&#8217; of Marketing Firm&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/12/investor-not-customer-of-marketing-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/12/investor-not-customer-of-marketing-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A company that valued and marketed certain bond funds purchased by plaintiff investors through a brokerage firm is not subject to FINRA arbitration proceedings, the 4th Circuit says, because the investors were not “customers” of the marketing company under the controlling FINRA rule; the district court order enjoining arbitration is affirmed. FINRA, the Financial Industry [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/12/investor-not-customer-of-marketing-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Qualified Immunity for Repeated Taser Use&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/06/no-qualified-immunity-for-repeated-taser-use/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/06/no-qualified-immunity-for-repeated-taser-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A police officer who repeatedly used a Taser on a man after he stopped resisting arrest does not have qualified immunity in this civil rights suit filed by the estate of the man, who died after the incident; the 4th Circuit upholds qualified immunity for two officers who entered the Baltimore County home, but reverses [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/06/no-qualified-immunity-for-repeated-taser-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No FCA Claim from ‘Off-Label’ Marketing&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/no-fca-claim-from-off-label-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/no-fca-claim-from-off-label-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pharmaceutical company employee has not stated a claim under the False Claims Act with general allegations that the company’s marketing of its “off-label” prescriptions and unnecessarily high-dose prescriptions of the company’s Kapidex drug necessarily meant that false claims for reimbursement had been submitted to federally sponsored health care plans; the 4th Circuit affirms dismissal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/no-fca-claim-from-off-label-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Hour Detention Was Unlawful Custody&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/08/three-hour-detention-was-unlawful-custody/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/08/three-hour-detention-was-unlawful-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search & Seizure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police violated defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by holding him for three hours while they obtained a warrant to search the premises after observing a suspected drug transaction at the convenience store where defendant worked and lived; the 4th Circuit vacates defendant’s firearms convictions as the two later Miranda warnings did not remove the illegal taint [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/08/three-hour-detention-was-unlawful-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Worker Rules Invalidated&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/farm-worker-rules-invalidated/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/farm-worker-rules-invalidated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal labor regulations governing farm workers, including workers on Christmas tree farms, could not be reinstated by the Department of Labor without the notice and comment period mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act, and the 4th Circuit upholds a district court decision invalidating DOL’s reinstatement of its prior regulations. This appeal involves a regulatory action [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/farm-worker-rules-invalidated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defrauding Corporation Not ‘Identity Theft’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/18/defrauding-corporation-not-identity-theft/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/18/defrauding-corporation-not-identity-theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A corporation is not a “person” under federal identity theft statutes, and the 4th Circuit says  defendants who schemed to deposit in a private bank account checks stolen by a bookkeeper for a small furniture company, cannot be convicted of identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7). The primary issue before us is whether the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/18/defrauding-corporation-not-identity-theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA Disability Rating Gets ‘Substantial’ Weight&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/va-disability-rating-gets-substantial-weight/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/va-disability-rating-gets-substantial-weight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A claimant who suffered post-traumatic stress disorder due to his combat experience in Vietnam gets another chance to win social security disability benefits, as the 4th Circuit says the administrative law judge erred by failing to give retrospective consideration to medical evidence created after claimant’s “date of last insurance” to qualify for benefits and did [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/va-disability-rating-gets-substantial-weight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insignia Convictions Upheld for Fake Officer&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/insignia-convictions-upheld-for-fake-officer/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/insignia-convictions-upheld-for-fake-officer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Barbara Milano Keenan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former Marine who intentionally misrepresented his military service record in seeking veterans’ benefits and by wearing a high-ranking uniform and numerous medals that he had not earned, is convicted on charges of making false statements to obtain benefits, converting government property and wearing a military uniform and insignia (medals) without authorization; the 4th Circuit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/insignia-convictions-upheld-for-fake-officer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
