<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Charles James Maxfield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-charles-james-maxfield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Counsel deleted: Battle over erased data leads to lawyer’s disqualification&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/15/counsel-deleted-battle-over-erased-data-leads-to-lawyers-disqualification/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/15/counsel-deleted-battle-over-erased-data-leads-to-lawyers-disqualification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An attorney accused of destroying telltale "metadata" on two computer thumb drives has been yanked from a $20-million case right before a scheduled two-week trial. The disqualification of an employment rights lawyer and her Reston law firm highlights the peril for lawyers handling computer data. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/15/counsel-deleted-battle-over-erased-data-leads-to-lawyers-disqualification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Award Struck on ‘Insulting Words’ Claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/07/jury-award-struck-on-insulting-words-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/07/jury-award-struck-on-insulting-words-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A jury awarded a total of $1.2 million in Fairfax businessman’s suit alleging defendant international businessman defamed him by denying he was plaintiff’s biological father and criticizing plaintiff’s handling of divorce and custody litigation, but the Fairfax Circuit Court strikes plaintiff’s “insulting words” claim. Plaintiff Michael Eric A.B. Mak Sun Ming Hotung filed suit against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/07/jury-award-struck-on-insulting-words-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mall abduction case settled for $2.6M&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/29/mall-abduction-case-settled-for-2-6m/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/29/mall-abduction-case-settled-for-2-6m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premises Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The husband of a woman killed in an abortive abduction and robbery in Northern Virginia has recovered $2.6 million in settlements with both the mall where she was abducted and a convenience store where she was forced to try to get money from an ATM. The husband claimed both businesses were liable for failing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/29/mall-abduction-case-settled-for-2-6m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Protective Order to Prevent Website Publicity&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/no-protective-order-to-prevent-website-publicity/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/no-protective-order-to-prevent-website-publicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit Court denies a protective order to plaintiff church to prevent defendants, who allegedly have defamed plaintiff on their website, from publishing on their website embarrassing materials defendants obtain through discovery. A number of allegedly defamatory statements on the website are enumerated in the complaint. Representative examples on the website complained of include [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/no-protective-order-to-prevent-website-publicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church can’t stop man from posting discovery&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/church-cant-stop-man-from-posting-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/church-cant-stop-man-from-posting-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fletcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A church that filed a defamation lawsuit based on commentary posted on a website cannot prevent the defendant from publishing any information he gains through discovery. A Fairfax Circuit judge denied the church’s request for a protective order and said it must answer the defendant’s interrogatories within 14 days. The World Mission Society Church of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/church-cant-stop-man-from-posting-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land taken from Wolf Trap to build power station, pond &#8211; $603,000 Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/28/land-taken-from-wolf-trap-to-build-power-station-pond-603000-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/28/land-taken-from-wolf-trap-to-build-power-station-pond-603000-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 10:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eminent Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/28/land-taken-from-wolf-trap-to-build-power-station-pond-603000-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case involved the taking of 64,958 square feet of land in fee, and 28,616 square feet of land in a temporary construction easement, from a 4.97 acre parcel owned by Wolf Trap in Vienna. The project included the installation of a power substation and storm water management pond on the property acquired. The commissioner [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/28/land-taken-from-wolf-trap-to-build-power-station-pond-603000-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Stock Fraud Case Advances&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An investor who thought his $200,000 payment to defendants was buying 40,000 shares in C2 Future stock that would allow expansion of an educational company into Korea, not “office expenses for existing schools,” can sue defendants for an alleged fraudulent scheme in violation of the Virginia Securities Act; the Fairfax Circuit Court denies defendants’ summary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/25/school-stock-fraud-case-advances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slander of Title Claim Barred After Two Years&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/17/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years-2/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/17/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/17/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this first-impression case, a Fairfax Circuit Court applies a two-year statute of limitations to a claim for slander of title and dismisses as time-barred a woman’s claim against Wells Fargo based on her husband’s alleged forgery of her signature on deeds of trust when he refinanced their home prior to his death. Plaintiff Ann [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/17/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slander of Title Claim Barred After Two Years&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/05/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/05/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/05/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this first-impression case, a Fairfax Circuit Court applies a two-year statute of limitations to a claim for slander of title and dismisses as time-barred a woman’s claim against Wells Fargo based on her husband’s alleged forgery of her signature on deeds of trust when he refinanced their home prior to his death. Plaintiff Ann [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/10/05/slander-of-title-claim-barred-after-two-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Punitives for Mortgage Forgery Claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/07/06/no-punitives-for-mortgage-forgery-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/07/06/no-punitives-for-mortgage-forgery-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Charles James Maxfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/07/06/no-punitives-for-mortgage-forgery-claim/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman who took property as a tenant by the entirety after her husband died but who says he forged her signature on two deeds trust that secured notes on the property cannot sue the mortgage company for punitive damages as she has not sufficiently alleged malice in the company’s attempts to collect on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/07/06/no-punitives-for-mortgage-forgery-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
