<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge David Stanford Schell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-david-stanford-schell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Panel disciplines Fairfax prosecutor&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/04/panel-disciplines-fairfax-prosecutor/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/04/panel-disciplines-fairfax-prosecutor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia State Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/04/panel-disciplines-fairfax-prosecutor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax County prosecutor has been disciplined by a three-judge panel for allowing co-defendant witnesses to lie in a criminal trial. In the discipline case against Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Mark J. Sullivan, the Virginia State Bar asked for a three-month suspension of Sullivan’s law license. The judges opted for the lesser punishment of a public [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/04/panel-disciplines-fairfax-prosecutor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lease Not Terminated When Eviction Action Stopped&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/07/lease-not-terminated-when-eviction-action-stopped/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/07/lease-not-terminated-when-eviction-action-stopped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord/Tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/07/lease-not-terminated-when-eviction-action-stopped/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A commercial lease was not terminated when the landlord suspended its 2009 action for possession of space leased and assigned by a tenant, but in any event, the tenant owed rent for the four-month period following the assignee’s post-default eviction before the premises were relet; a Fairfax Circuit Court enters judgment for the landlord. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/06/07/lease-not-terminated-when-eviction-action-stopped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Plea in Bar for ‘Wrong Defendant’ Defense&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/26/no-plea-in-bar-for-%e2%80%98wrong-defendant%e2%80%99-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/26/no-plea-in-bar-for-%e2%80%98wrong-defendant%e2%80%99-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/26/no-plea-in-bar-for-%e2%80%98wrong-defendant%e2%80%99-defense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although a pro se plaintiff sued the owner, not the driver, of the vehicle involved in an auto accident that allegedly caused his injuries, a Fairfax Circuit Court overrules the owner’s plea in bar arguing plaintiff sued the wrong defendant, as plaintiff’s complaint may be read to assert a claim of negligent entrustment. A plea [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/26/no-plea-in-bar-for-%e2%80%98wrong-defendant%e2%80%99-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorist hit while standing beside disabled vehicle &#8211; $20,000 Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/23/motorist-hit-while-standing-beside-disabled-vehicle-20000-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/23/motorist-hit-while-standing-beside-disabled-vehicle-20000-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/23/motorist-hit-while-standing-beside-disabled-vehicle-20000-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiff was standing beside her disabled vehicle when she was struck by the defendant’s vehicle, which was approaching from behind. She alleged that the defendant caused the collision by following the car in front of her too closely, leaving insufficient time to react. Plaintiff testified her injuries had largely resolved by the time of trial. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/05/23/motorist-hit-while-standing-beside-disabled-vehicle-20000-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer beats pro se malpractice lawsuit&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/02/21/lawyer-beats-pro-se-malpractice-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/02/21/lawyer-beats-pro-se-malpractice-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Brett A. Kassabian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Dennis J. Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jan L. Brodie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge R. Terrence Ney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=60248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The slightly built woman stands, apparently alone, on a busy corner in bustling Tysons Corner, Virginia. In the video she posted on YouTube, she is dwarfed by the office buildings behind her and appears in danger of being blown over by the rush of traffic. The woman carries a battery of signs – two sandwich-style [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2011/02/21/lawyer-beats-pro-se-malpractice-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fee dispute suit spawns battle of ex-presidents&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/08/27/fee-dispute-suit-spawns-battle-of-ex-presidents/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/08/27/fee-dispute-suit-spawns-battle-of-ex-presidents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=56738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fee collection lawsuit in Fairfax has turned into a battle pitting a former president of the Virginia Bar Association against a former president of the Virginia State Bar amid allegations of legal malpractice and overbilling. The Lewis Law Firm is a Virginia firm based in Washington; it is headed by Glenn C. Lewis, who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/08/27/fee-dispute-suit-spawns-battle-of-ex-presidents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate &#8211; HOAs &#8211; Disclosure Packet &#8211; Slander Of Title&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/07/16/real-estate-hoas-disclosure-packet-slander-of-title/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/07/16/real-estate-hoas-disclosure-packet-slander-of-title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=55958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit Court dismisses a homeowner’s suit against a Falls Church homeowners’ association alleging slander of title and tortious interference with contract allegedly arising from statements in the association’s Disclosure Property questioning placement of a fence. Plaintiff alleges counts of slander of title, tortious interference and violation of Va. Code § 55-515(A), and separately [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/07/16/real-estate-hoas-disclosure-packet-slander-of-title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal &#8211; Brady Claim &#8211; Exculpatory Evidence&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/01/criminal-brady-claim-exculpatory-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/01/criminal-brady-claim-exculpatory-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=51544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit Court sets aside defendant’s robbery and abduction for profit convictions because the commonwealth’s failure to inform defendant that a codefendant was given consideration for his testimony against defendant, an omission that violated defendant’s due process rights under Brady v. Maryland, and because the prosecutor’s failure to correct a witness’s known false testimony [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2010/02/01/criminal-brady-claim-exculpatory-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure &#8211; Statement Of Facts &#8211; Timely Filing&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2009/12/21/civil-procedure-statement-of-facts-timely-filing-2/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2009/12/21/civil-procedure-statement-of-facts-timely-filing-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David Stanford Schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=50035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit declines to sign or certify a Statement of Facts filed too late by defendants, who seek to set aside a default judgment entered against them. Rule 5:5(a) provides that the times prescribed for filing a written statement of facts are mandatory. Rule 5:11 provides that a written statement of facts becomes a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2009/12/21/civil-procedure-statement-of-facts-timely-filing-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
