<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Edward Hogshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-edward-hogshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia high court to weigh cameras in courtrooms</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/26/virginia-court-to-weigh-cameras-in-courtrooms/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/26/virginia-court-to-weigh-cameras-in-courtrooms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Virginia has agreed to look at whether judges have an unfettered right to reject news cameras in their courtrooms, or whether they need a good reason to block access. The issue comes in the appeal arising from the emotion-laden trial of George Huguely V, the University of Virginia student convicted last [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/26/virginia-court-to-weigh-cameras-in-courtrooms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court reinstates full verdict in ‘Lester’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/10/high-court-reinstates-full-verdict-in-lester/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/10/high-court-reinstates-full-verdict-in-lester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Cleo E. Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Elizabeth A. McClanahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Verdicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Virginia has reinstated the full jury verdict of $6,227,000 on Isaiah Lester’s wrongful death claim based on the loss of his wife in a car accident in 2007. The court’s ruling closes the book on a high-profile, high-dollar personal-injury case in Albemarle County. The trial judge had reduced the jury’s award [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/10/high-court-reinstates-full-verdict-in-lester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court hears record wrongful death appeal&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/31/high-court-hears-record-wrongful-death-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/31/high-court-hears-record-wrongful-death-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albemarle County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Cleo E. Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Donald W. Lemons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Verdicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man should not keep a jury award for his wife’s death when he and his lawyer conspired to remove photos from his Facebook page and then lied about it to the court, a defense lawyer told the Supreme Court of Virginia on Oct. 30. Probing for prejudice the defendant might have suffered, several justices [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/31/high-court-hears-record-wrongful-death-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Brady Hearing on Planned Civil Suit&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-brady-hearing-on-planned-civil-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-brady-hearing-on-planned-civil-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville Circuit Court denies defendant George Huguely V’s motion for an evidentiary hearing on his claim that the commonwealth violated Brady v. Maryland by withholding information about plans by the family of the victim, Huguely’s fellow UVa student and former girlfriend, to file a civil suit for wrongful death. The defense is seeking a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-brady-hearing-on-planned-civil-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former U.Va. athlete gets 23 years for slaying ex&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/former-u-va-athlete-gets-23-years-for-slaying-ex/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/former-u-va-athlete-gets-23-years-for-slaying-ex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News In Brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHARLOTTESVILLE — A former University of Virginia lacrosse player who killed his ex-girlfriend in a drunken rage received a 23-year prison sentence Aug. 30 in a case that forever changed the school’s attitudes toward relationship violence and made it easier for abuse victims in the state to obtain restraining orders. George W. Huguely V had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/former-u-va-athlete-gets-23-years-for-slaying-ex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No ‘Equitable Indemnification’ in Towing Case&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/no-equitable-indemnification-in-towing-case/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/no-equitable-indemnification-in-towing-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a follow-up to this court’s decision that plaintiff wrecker service must indemnify the city for a $200,000 loss for fire damage to a city bus the wrecker service was towing, a Charlottesville Circuit Court says the wrecker service does not have a claim for equitable indemnification against the two defendants who prepared the bus [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/30/no-equitable-indemnification-in-towing-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Corrosion’ exclusion does not bar coverage&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/26/corrosion-exclusion-does-not-bar-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/26/corrosion-exclusion-does-not-bar-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville Circuit Court says an ice rink has insurance coverage for damages from the failure of the heat exchanger in the ice rink’s water heating system, despite the carrier’s denial of coverage on the ground that the heat exchanger failed due to corrosion, an excluded cause of loss under the policy. The pertinent portion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/07/26/corrosion-exclusion-does-not-bar-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retired Husband Wins Spousal Support&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/11/retired-husband-wins-spousal-support/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/11/retired-husband-wins-spousal-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=67719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple married for 23 years, with two emancipated children, is granted a no-fault divorce, and the 53-year-old wife, who earns monthly gross income of $11,833, is ordered by the Charlottesville Circuit Court to pay the 69-year-old husband, who is retired, $1,800 in monthly spousal support. The parties’ Nelson County real estate is mountainous, difficult [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/11/retired-husband-wins-spousal-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s just Google! Keeping jurors offline to stay in line</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/18/it%e2%80%99s-just-google-keeping-jurors-offline-to-stay-in-line/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/18/it%e2%80%99s-just-google-keeping-jurors-offline-to-stay-in-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Pamela S. Baskervill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/18/it%e2%80%99s-just-google-keeping-jurors-offline-to-stay-in-line/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NORFOLK – Jurors who have a hard time putting their Internet habit on hold during jury service need strong guidance from trial judges, a jury research expert says. In Virginia courtrooms and around the country, jurors are yielding to the impulse to “just Google it” when they have a question. A once-or-twice warning not to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/18/it%e2%80%99s-just-google-keeping-jurors-offline-to-stay-in-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single Photo ID Not too Suggestive&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/single-photo-id-not-too-suggestive/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/single-photo-id-not-too-suggestive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottesville Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Edward Hogshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/single-photo-id-not-too-suggestive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville Circuit Court denies defendant’s motion to suppress an out-of-court identification of him by the alleged victim as the intruder into the victim’s home, following discovery of a photo identification card bearing defendant’s picture outside near the driveway to the victim’s home. Defendant alleges the single photograph procedure used by the officer was unduly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/01/single-photo-id-not-too-suggestive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
