<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-everett-a-martin-jr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Changes Did Not Create ‘New’ Policy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/changes-did-not-create-new-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/changes-did-not-create-new-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A business auto liability policy at issue was a “renewal” and not a “new” policy, and the Norfolk Circuit Court rejects plaintiff’s claim that he had additional UIM coverage. Plaintiff has filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the amount of underinsured motorist coverage available to him under a business auto policy Ace [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/changes-did-not-create-new-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to treat kidney stone results in sepsis, necrosis &#8211; $2,750,000 Verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/failure-to-treat-kidney-stone-results-in-sepsis-necrosis-2700000-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/failure-to-treat-kidney-stone-results-in-sepsis-necrosis-2700000-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million-Dollar Verdicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiff, age 71, began seeing defendant urologist in June 2008. The doctor identified a 6mm kidney stone and told the plaintiff it would pass. The following month the plaintiff went to the emergency room with renal colic, as the stone had shifted and was blocking the kidney’s juncture with the ureter, but then shifted. Over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/failure-to-treat-kidney-stone-results-in-sepsis-necrosis-2700000-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contractor Board Erred on Homeowner Claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/19/contractor-board-erred-on-homeowner-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/19/contractor-board-erred-on-homeowner-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A homeowner who won a default judgment against a contractor who accepted $35,000 to build an addition to her house only to have him dig a trench, pour footings and then abandon the job, wins reconsideration of her claim by the Board for Contractors; the Norfolk Circuit Court says the board erred by not considering [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/19/contractor-board-erred-on-homeowner-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Default Judgment Vacated for Defective Service&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/19/default-judgment-vacated-for-defective-service/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/19/default-judgment-vacated-for-defective-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Norfolk Circuit Court vacates a default judgment entered against defendant on a contract claim, as plaintiff failed to effect personal service at the Norfolk address where defendant has lived since 1990 and constructive service on defendant was defective because the affidavit of service of process did not indicate service included the complaint and summons. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/12/19/default-judgment-vacated-for-defective-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Damages for Violating Foreclosure Reg&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/05/no-damages-for-violating-foreclosure-reg/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/05/no-damages-for-violating-foreclosure-reg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the failure to conduct or arrange for a face-to-face meeting may have been a sufficient basis to stop foreclosure sale of plaintiff’s property, or to impose a regulatory sanction or a nominal damages award, it is not a sufficient ground to award compensatory damages or set aside the completed foreclosure sale to a third [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/05/no-damages-for-violating-foreclosure-reg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Amendment to Recoup Funds&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-amendment-to-recoup-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-amendment-to-recoup-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Norfolk Circuit Court denies plaintiff agency’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, in this case attempting to recoup monies paid to a former public employee. Plaintiff’s motion states it learned on Nov. 2, 2011, that a department of the commonwealth determined it would be obligated to repay monies improperly paid to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/no-amendment-to-recoup-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachelor-party patron can sue for steakhouse stabbing&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/16/customer-can-sue-restaurant-for-barroom-stabbing/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/16/customer-can-sue-restaurant-for-barroom-stabbing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Vieth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man stabbed at a Norfolk bar can sue the bar owner for negligence based on claims that the bar staff ignored several instances of aggressive behavior by the attacker. Norfolk Circuit Judge Everett A. Martin Jr. rejected a bid to toss the lawsuit filed by Benjamin Hoover against the owner of the former Magnolia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/16/customer-can-sue-restaurant-for-barroom-stabbing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supervisor Not Liable for ‘No-Show’ Worker&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/25/supervisor-not-liable-for-no-show-worker/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/25/supervisor-not-liable-for-no-show-worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=67964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Norfolk city agency cannot collect contract damages against the supervisor of a “no-show” employee for the money the agency paid the absent employee, a Norfolk Circuit Court says. The court overrules defendant’s demurrer on three grounds: that the contract was too vague to establish a standard to judge defendant George Pratt’s actions; the breach [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/06/25/supervisor-not-liable-for-no-show-worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Miranda Violation for Presentence Report&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/no-miranda-violation-for-presentence-report/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/no-miranda-violation-for-presentence-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/no-miranda-violation-for-presentence-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The commonwealth did not violate an incarcerated defendant’s Miranda rights when a probation officer sent defendant a presentence report form that asked him to describe the crime in detail, and used his response to charge him with another crime; a Norfolk Circuit Court says defendant was not “in custody” under Miranda. Defendant was convicted of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/05/16/no-miranda-violation-for-presentence-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Board Sues Over Pay for No-Show Employee&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/04/02/board-sues-over-pay-for-no-show-employee/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/04/02/board-sues-over-pay-for-no-show-employee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Everett A. Martin Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/04/02/board-sues-over-pay-for-no-show-employee/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Norfolk Community Services Board may bring a claim of unjust enrichment against a former employee who continued to collect pay and benefits for 12 years after her suspension, but it may only seek recovery for pay dating from 2008, says a Norfolk Circuit Court holds. Defendant Jill McGlone does not contest that the CSB [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/04/02/board-sues-over-pay-for-no-show-employee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
