<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge G. Steven Agee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-g-steven-agee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trademarking Counterfeiting Convictions Vacated&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/trademarking-counterfeiting-convictions-vacated/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/trademarking-counterfeiting-convictions-vacated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their prosecution of two defendants for a scheme to import and resell counterfeit pieces of computer networking equipment, including some with a Cisco Systems trademark, the government’s theory of prosecution based on a “material alteration” theory of counterfeiting trademarks is not cognizable under the criminal counterfeiting statute on the facts of this case, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/trademarking-counterfeiting-convictions-vacated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Payment to Surety Not ‘Preference’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/payment-to-surety-not-preference/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/payment-to-surety-not-preference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $1.375 million transfer by debtor, an environmental engineering firm, to a Miller Act surety within 90 days of debtor’s bankruptcy filing was not an avoidable preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b), and the 4th Circuit affirms summary judgment for the insurance company in this suit filed by the bankruptcy trustee. The trustee filed an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/payment-to-surety-not-preference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Offender Registration Upheld for Juvenile Offender&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/sex-offender-registration-upheld-for-juvenile-offender/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/sex-offender-registration-upheld-for-juvenile-offender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An appellant adjudicated a juvenile delinquent for the aggravated sexual abuse of his two half-sisters, ages six and 10, while his family resided in Japan with his mother who was on active duty with the U.S. Navy, is required to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 42 U.S.C. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/sex-offender-registration-upheld-for-juvenile-offender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charterer Can’t Collect with Alter Ego Theory&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/13/charterer-cant-collect-with-alter-ego-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/13/charterer-cant-collect-with-alter-ego-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admiralty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A district court had admiralty jurisdiction to consider appeal of a ship charterer’s attempt to collect on a judgment against the ship’s owner by attaching a vessel docked at Baltimore, but the 4th Circuit upholds the district court’s decision to vacate its ex parte order of attachment and dismiss the ship charterer’s complaint based on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/13/charterer-cant-collect-with-alter-ego-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police Confirmed Informant Drug-Buy Details&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/08/police-confirmed-informant-drug-buy-details/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/08/police-confirmed-informant-drug-buy-details/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 4th Circuit upholds defendant’s firearm convictions and 100-month sentence, holding that police were entitled to stop and search defendant’s car, based on their corroboration of details provided by a confidential informant who had arranged a drug buy from defendant. The totality of the circumstances afforded the police reasonable suspicion to stop the car defendant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/08/police-confirmed-informant-drug-buy-details/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trustee Can’t Assert FDIC’s Claims&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/trustee-cant-assert-fdics-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/trustee-cant-assert-fdics-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bankruptcy trustee for debtor corporation whose principal asset, a bank, went into receivership with the FDIC, may not assert derivative claims against the corporate directors for breach of fiduciary duties, as these claims properly belong to the FDIC; however, the 4th Circuit says the trustee may assert a claim for improper subordination of debtor’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/07/trustee-cant-assert-fdics-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No FTCA Claim Based on Veteran Benefits&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/02/no-ftca-claim-based-on-veteran-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/02/no-ftca-claim-based-on-veteran-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although a veteran’s widow won payments from the Veterans’ Administration under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 after her husband died from alleged medical negligence, she cannot advance the VA rating that won her benefits to pursue her claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and the 4th Circuit affirms dismissal of her claims for wrongful death [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/02/no-ftca-claim-based-on-veteran-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life Sentence Vacated for Guidelines Error&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/life-sentence-vacated-for-guidelines-error/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/life-sentence-vacated-for-guidelines-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 4th Circuit affirms a defendant’s conviction for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924, but vacates his life sentence because the district court erred in applying the murder cross-reference in the federal sentencing guidelines and in treating as relevant conduct a murder that occurred as part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/10/life-sentence-vacated-for-guidelines-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Cold Hit’ DNA Search Upheld for Good Faith&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/22/cold-hit-dna-search-upheld-for-good-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/22/cold-hit-dna-search-upheld-for-good-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police did not violate defendant’s rights when they collected his bloodstained clothing from a hospital four years earlier during investigation of defendant as a gunshot victim and his arrest on marijuana charges, but subsequent testing of the bloodstain for defendant’s DNA in connection with a later murder investigation in which defendant was never charged, did [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/22/cold-hit-dna-search-upheld-for-good-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No ERISA Claim for Pension Plan’s Retirement Age&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/02/no-erisa-claim-for-pension-plans-retirement-age/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/02/no-erisa-claim-for-pension-plans-retirement-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge G. Steven Agee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 4th Circuit affirms dismissal of a class-action suit by bank employees who claim defendant Bank of America employed a “normal retirement age” that violated ERISA in calculating lump sum distributions, and violated ERISA in the calculation of benefit accrual. Plaintiffs and the class they represent are current and former bank employees and plan participants. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/02/no-erisa-claim-for-pension-plans-retirement-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
