<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Gerald Bruce Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-gerald-bruce-lee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interstate Delivery Drivers Lose on Preemption Issue&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/15/interstate-delivery-drivers-lose-on-preemption-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/15/interstate-delivery-drivers-lose-on-preemption-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Alexandria U.S. District Court grants summary judgment to defendant Lasership Inc. in this suit filed by a purported class of delivery truck drivers who allege they were misclassified under the Massachusetts Independent Contractor Statute, M.G.L. 149 § 148B. Though headquartered in Vienna, Va., Lasership maintains facilities in Woburn, Mass., and Meriden, Conn. In the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/15/interstate-delivery-drivers-lose-on-preemption-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Super Bowl sob story&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/a-super-bowl-sob-story/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/a-super-bowl-sob-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Anthony J. Trenga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Diana Gribbon Motz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s how missing the Super Bowl can get your case into federal court. Residents of two NoVa subdivisions chafed under contracts that said they could subscribe to one, and only one, cable provider. The folks in Lansdowne on the Potomac, which had over 2,000 residents, began complaining about the quality of service provided by OpenBand [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/a-super-bowl-sob-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contractor Suit Not Barred by Term Sheet&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/contractor-suit-not-barred-by-term-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/contractor-suit-not-barred-by-term-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this dispute between an Afghan company that subcontracted logistics services for the U.S. military in Afghanistan and Pakistan and a Virginia global logistics services contractor, a counterclaim is not barred by the parties’ earlier “agreement to agree,” and the Alexandria U.S. District Court will not strike the counterclaim or impose sanctions. Plaintiff Global Hub [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/contractor-suit-not-barred-by-term-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Attorney’s Fees for Banks’ Tort Defense&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/no-attorneys-fees-for-banks-tort-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/no-attorneys-fees-for-banks-tort-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creditor's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Alexandria U.S. District Court says although the parties’ loan documents allow a bank to collect attorney’s fees for expenses “incurred to enforce” the loan documents, the documents’ fee-shifting provisions do not cover the bank’s legal fees for defending a tort suit filed by plaintiff debtors after the bank’s collection agency contacted debtors’ customers. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/no-attorneys-fees-for-banks-tort-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Race Discrimination in Loan Extension Denial&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/no-race-discrimination-in-loan-extension-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/no-race-discrimination-in-loan-extension-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this race discrimination case against a commercial lender, plaintiff entrepreneur and his companies have failed to raise any genuine issues of material fact about defendant bank’s denial of loan extensions, and the Alexandria U.S. District Court grants summary judgment to the bank. Plaintiffs are Best Medical International Inc., Gunston Hall Realty Inc., Huestis Machine [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/10/no-race-discrimination-in-loan-extension-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Association Said Logo Used in Ad Sales&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/01/association-said-logo-used-in-ad-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/01/association-said-logo-used-in-ad-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case involving trademark infringement claims by a trade association against an individual due to the individual’s advertisements soliciting trade association members for listing in a directory, the Alexandria U.S. District Court adopts the magistrate judge’s recommendation as to plaintiff association’s trademark infringement claim because defendant’s ads contained marks that were distinguishable from plaintiff’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/01/association-said-logo-used-in-ad-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No FCA Claim for False Inspection Records&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/no-fca-claim-for-false-inspection-records/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/no-fca-claim-for-false-inspection-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although an electrician who worked for a civilian contractor providing military support services in Iraq alleges the contractor falsely certified the performance of ground resistance testing, he has failed to allege any payment of false claims and the Alexandria U.S. District Court dismisses his suit under the False Claims Act. At the core of this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/no-fca-claim-for-false-inspection-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages Dispute Stays in Bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/damages-dispute-stays-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/damages-dispute-stays-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Bankruptcy Court entered a default judgment for over $13 million for real estate purchasers claiming fraud, the Alexandria U.S. District Court denies the agent’s motion to withdraw its reference of the adversary proceeding: erroneous legal judgments are not grounds for withdrawal; this case does not concern laws affecting interstate comment so as to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/damages-dispute-stays-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Tort Claim from Post-Merger Job Changes&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/no-tort-claim-from-post-merger-job-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/no-tort-claim-from-post-merger-job-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman who continued to work for the new company after her former employer merged with another waste company, but who complained about her treatment by a different management team from the other company that “micromanaged” employees, has not stated a claim for tortious interference with business expectancy, says the Alexandria U.S. District Court. Plaintiff [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/no-tort-claim-from-post-merger-job-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Arbitration Clause Enforceable Against Consumer&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/12/email-arbitration-clause-enforceable-against-consumer-2/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/12/email-arbitration-clause-enforceable-against-consumer-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Gerald Bruce Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Verizon customer who is suing over a $135 early-termination fee for his cancellation of his Internet service must arbitrate his complaint based on an arbitration clause embedded in an email, as the initial contract expressly stated that continued use of the service constituted consent to contract modifications; the Alexandria U.S. District Court also says [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/12/email-arbitration-clause-enforceable-against-consumer-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
