<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Glen A. Huff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-glen-a-huff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Officer’s Testimony Proved Speeding, DUI&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/officers-testimony-proved-speeding-dui/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/officers-testimony-proved-speeding-dui/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals affirms defendant’s bench trial convictions for speeding and misdemeanor driving under the influence  of alcohol; the arresting officer’s observations suffice to prove speeding regardless whether his speedometer was calibrated; defendant’s Fourth Amendment objections to the stop that revealed his intoxication are waived by failing to present them below One December evening [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/officers-testimony-proved-speeding-dui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court allows do-over for procedural defaults&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/27/appeals-court-allows-do-over-for-procedural-defaults/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/27/appeals-court-allows-do-over-for-procedural-defaults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert J. Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Robert P. Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Stephen R. McCullough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William G. Petty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some procedural errors that may have meant dismissed appeals will no longer be fatal, a divided Virginia Court of Appeals said today in a trio of en banc cases. Specifically, in two cases, the court allowed amendments to retool assignments of error and to specify page references to show an appellate claim had been preserved. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/27/appeals-court-allows-do-over-for-procedural-defaults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procrastination not Contempt&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/procrastination-not-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/procrastination-not-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals reverses and dismisses public defender’s summary contempt conviction and $150 fine under Va. Code § 18.2-456(1); the record evidence is insufficient to show public defender had the requisite intent to obstruct or interfere with the administration of justice in waiting until two days before a scheduled bench trial to withdraw his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/procrastination-not-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prior Juvenile Adjudication and Firearm Proved&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/prior-juvenile-adjudication-and-firearm-proved/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/prior-juvenile-adjudication-and-firearm-proved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals affirms juvenile’s jury trial conviction for possessing a firearm after a prior delinquency adjudication for a felonious act: the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District (JDR) Court order was a prior adjudication based on defendant’s guilty plea and the apprehending police officers’ testimony proved defendant dropped a loaded Smith and Wesson revolver [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/12/prior-juvenile-adjudication-and-firearm-proved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agency Could Not Order Platform Removal&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/11/agency-could-not-order-platform-removal/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/11/agency-could-not-order-platform-removal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On rehearing en banc, the Court of Appeals affirms a circuit court decision holding that appellant Virginia Marine Resources Commission lacked jurisdiction to order Chincoteague Inn to remove a floating platform from over state-owned bottomland. VMRC argues the circuit court erred in holding that the agency had no jurisdiction to order removal of the platform. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/11/agency-could-not-order-platform-removal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Upholds Suppression of Driver’s Drugs&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/court-upholds-suppression-of-drivers-drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/court-upholds-suppression-of-drivers-drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search & Seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A defendant’s consent to search of her vehicle was not valid, as that consent was given after defendant, traveling late at night with three children, was stopped in a rural area by two uniformed deputies, one of whom stood by her vehicle window, holstered gun on display, and asked her about drugs after telling her [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/court-upholds-suppression-of-drivers-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Plea Withdrawal for Mental Instability Claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/22/no-plea-withdrawal-for-mental-instability-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/22/no-plea-withdrawal-for-mental-instability-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although defendant contends he was not mentally stable when he entered his Alford plea to grand larceny and he was not allowed to contest his guilt by asserting that he was not guilty of taking money for work he had not done, the Court of Appeals affirms denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/22/no-plea-withdrawal-for-mental-instability-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Order Registration Upheld&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/15/support-order-registration-upheld/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/15/support-order-registration-upheld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although a father argues a Virginia court’s registration of a North Carolina order improperly extended his child support obligation, the Court of Appeals says he cannot overturn registration of the 1997 North Carolina order that modified a 1994 child support order entered by a New York court when the parties divorced. On appeal, the father [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/15/support-order-registration-upheld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Felony Eluding is Separate Offense&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/felony-eluding-is-separate-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/felony-eluding-is-separate-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A defendant who pleads guilty to reckless driving in general district court is not entitled to set aside his conviction for felony eluding on double jeopardy grounds; the Court of Appeals says  Va. Code § 19.2-294 does not bar simultaneous prosecutions and the offenses involved are separate requiring proof of different facts. A police officer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/felony-eluding-is-separate-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cashier’s List of Stolen Items Inadmissible&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/17/cashiers-list-of-stolen-items-inadmissible/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/17/cashiers-list-of-stolen-items-inadmissible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen A. Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman’s conviction of felony shoplifting is reversed because the trial court erred in admitting the commonwealth’s exhibits of a list of items stolen from a Family Dollar Store, prepared by a cashier with the store manager’s help, on the testimony of the manager alone; defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated because she did not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/09/17/cashiers-list-of-stolen-items-inadmissible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
