<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Glen E. Conrad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-glen-e-conrad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Analogue Act Upheld for ‘Bath Salts’ Sale&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/15/analogue-act-upheld-for-bath-salts-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/15/analogue-act-upheld-for-bath-salts-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A defendant cannot win judgment of acquittal after a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiracy and distribution of “bath salts” – controlled substance analogues for human consumption – in violation of the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986; the Charlottesville U.S. District Court rejects defendant’s challenges to 1) the constitutionality of the Analogue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/15/analogue-act-upheld-for-bath-salts-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract Assignee May Sue for Breach&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/contract-assignee-may-sue-for-breach/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/contract-assignee-may-sue-for-breach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville U.S. District Court says plaintiff building contractor, who was assigned a contract for construction of an office for an auto body shop in Culpeper, may sue defendant North Carolina company, for breach of contract based on alleged faulty workmanship that resulted in water damage and mold problems that required the contractor to compensate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/contract-assignee-may-sue-for-breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TASER Expert’s Testimony Limited&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/taser-experts-testimony-limited/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/taser-experts-testimony-limited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case against a stun gun manufacturer for allegedly failing to provide sufficient warnings about the weapon’s risk for people with heart conditions, a Charlottesville U.S. District Court says earlier limitations it placed on testimony by plaintiff’s expert about TASER’s instructional warnings are not fatal to plaintiff’s case, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/taser-experts-testimony-limited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay-Raise Denial States Race Bias Claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/pay-raise-denial-states-race-bias-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/pay-raise-denial-states-race-bias-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Eastern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Big Stone Gap U.S. District Court says plaintiff VDOT employee has stated a Title VII race discrimination claim based on allegations that he was denied a pay raise because of his status as a Caucasian, but the court dismisses plaintiff’s claim of discriminatory discipline because the comparator he cites is an African-American manager that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/16/pay-raise-denial-states-race-bias-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Has Claim for Sexual Assault by Coworker&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/employee-has-claim-for-sexual-assault-by-coworker/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/employee-has-claim-for-sexual-assault-by-coworker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman who alleges she was sexually assaulted in the company parking lot by a coworker who had not been identified as a registered sex offender by an employer background check may sue defendant employer, staffing agency and security company for assault and battery, negligent hiring and negligent retention, as these claims are not barred [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/20/employee-has-claim-for-sexual-assault-by-coworker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Pleading Standard Controls Pleadings&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/federal-pleading-standard-controls-pleadings/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/federal-pleading-standard-controls-pleadings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A contractor has adequately alleged compliance with conditions precedent in its pleadings suing defendant public authority for breach of two contracts for sewer system upgrades, and the Charlottesville U.S. District Court denies the authority’s motion to dismiss. In 2009, defendant Rivanna Water &#38; Sewer Authority Inc. solicited bids from contractors for the Meadow Creek Sanitary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/federal-pleading-standard-controls-pleadings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expert Must Review Reports to Testify&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/expert-must-review-reports-to-testify/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/expert-must-review-reports-to-testify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case against a stun gun manufacturer for allegedly failing to provide sufficient warnings about the weapon’s risk for people with heart conditions, a Charlottesville U.S. District Court will limit expert testimony; plaintiff’s human factors expert may only testify about the adequacy of warnings in materials he actually has reviewed. To be admissible under [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/14/expert-must-review-reports-to-testify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estate Has Products Liability Claim in Taser Death&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/14/estate-has-products-liability-claim-in-taser-death/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/14/estate-has-products-liability-claim-in-taser-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A police officer responding to a domestic call involving a man who had kicked his son during a fight has qualified immunity from an excessive force claim filed by the estate of the man, who died after the officer used a taser aimed at the man’s chest; but the Charlottesville U.S. District Court says the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/14/estate-has-products-liability-claim-in-taser-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer Says Male Had Better Interview&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/employer-says-male-had-better-interview/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/employer-says-male-had-better-interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A state agency cannot win summary judgment in this sex discrimination case filed by a female engineer who lost out on a promotion when VDOT hired a less experienced male; an Abingdon U.S. District Court says VDOT’s “meager” and subjective explanation that the male performed better during an interview does not defeat plaintiff’s claim of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/employer-says-male-had-better-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Partner Has Claims for Fraud, Tortious Interference&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/former-partner-has-claims-for-fraud-tortious-interference/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/former-partner-has-claims-for-fraud-tortious-interference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Glen E. Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A plaintiff who had a long-term romantic relationship and a business partnership with defendant, managing a Nelson County horse farm and breeding operation, can sue defendant for fraudulent inducement in obtaining her signature on a Second Agreement in which he allegedly said he was single although he had married a woman in Florida in 2007 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/02/04/former-partner-has-claims-for-fraud-tortious-interference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
