<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Jonathan C. Thacher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-jonathan-c-thacher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Broker Seeks Commission on Shopping Center Sale&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/14/broker-seeks-commission-on-shopping-center-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/14/broker-seeks-commission-on-shopping-center-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In plaintiff broker’s suit for commission for the sale of Winchester Station shopping center, defendant had a buyer’s brokerage agreement of no definite duration and a confidentiality agreement for one year, prior to the property being listed, and the Fairfax Circuit Court denies summary judgment to defendant buyer because there are disputed facts concerning the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/14/broker-seeks-commission-on-shopping-center-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOAs in chaos&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/11/hoas-in-chaos/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/11/hoas-in-chaos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Lawyers Weekly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Virginia News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homeowners associations in Virginia – and their lawyers – are taking a close look at how they enforce rules and charges after a series of adverse court decisions and the prominent bankruptcy of one Fairfax County community association. The cases have “thrown a lot of HOAs into chaos,” one lawyer said. Attorneys who advise condominiums [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/03/11/hoas-in-chaos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consent-to-Sell Provisions Are Ambiguous&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/consent-to-sell-provisions-are-ambiguous/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/consent-to-sell-provisions-are-ambiguous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this dispute over a contract for the sale of real estate with multiple owners, the owners’ Operating Agreements are ambiguous because one provision states 51 percent of the members must agree to sell, and another provision says it takes 80 percent of the members to consent, and the Fairfax Circuit Court says the ambiguity [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/consent-to-sell-provisions-are-ambiguous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Has Respondeat Superior Claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/employee-has-respondeat-superior-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/employee-has-respondeat-superior-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=72012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman who was hired at age 18 to manage two Wireless Unlimited stores in Vienna, and who alleges the store owner’s 35-year-old friend, who was allowed to act as a store manager, openly threatened her with sexual assault, cursed at her, called her names and sexually assaulted her after taking her home from a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/01/17/employee-has-respondeat-superior-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Granted on Cruelty Grounds&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/divorce-granted-on-cruelty-grounds/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/divorce-granted-on-cruelty-grounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit Court grants plaintiff wife a divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion, as credible evidence showed husband subjected wife to two separate physical assaults; the court awards wife $34,245 in attorney’s fees. The court holds each party is entitled to one-half of the balance of multiple investment accounts, or $28,462. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/divorce-granted-on-cruelty-grounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indemnification Clause OK in Mold-Based Complaint&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/indemnification-clause-ok-in-mold-based-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/indemnification-clause-ok-in-mold-based-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=71009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit Court says a general contractor defending against a suit alleging damage from mold infestation in the townhouse it built may sue a waterproofing subcontractor for equitable and contractual indemnification, as the claims pass muster under the 2011 Uniwest decision. A tenant sued her landlord and the contractor who built the townhouse where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/20/indemnification-clause-ok-in-mold-based-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Change Clause Not ‘Self-Executing’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/support-change-clause-not-self-executing/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/support-change-clause-not-self-executing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 1999 property settlement agreement stating husband could reduce his monthly child support from $1,500 to $1,050 per month if, “through no fault” of his, he lost his supplemental income as a consultant, was not self-executing, and the husband owes an arrearage after his unilateral reduction of his child support obligation, a Fairfax Circuit Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/support-change-clause-not-self-executing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beer Rights Fight Remanded to ABC Board&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/beer-rights-fight-remanded-to-abc-board/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/beer-rights-fight-remanded-to-abc-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this dispute between two beer distributors over their respective territories and rights to distribute Dogfish beer, a Fairfax Circuit Court remands the case back to the ABC board because it is not clear from the administrative record that the board applied the proper presumption favoring the wholesaler. Under the Beer Franchise Act, Va. Code [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/beer-rights-fight-remanded-to-abc-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delayed Diagnosis Is Basis for Emotional Distress&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/delayed-diagnosis-is-basis-for-emotional-distress/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/delayed-diagnosis-is-basis-for-emotional-distress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=69947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Fairfax Circuit Court upholds a jury award to a woman who alleges defendant radiologist failed to diagnose her with Stage I or II breast cancer after reading her mammogram, so that her cancer progressed and reduced her chance of survival below 50 percent; however, the court reduces the award of $2.65 million to Virginia’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/10/04/delayed-diagnosis-is-basis-for-emotional-distress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Client’s Malpractice Claim Survives&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/10/divorce-clients-malpractice-claim-survives/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/10/divorce-clients-malpractice-claim-survives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax County Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Jonathan C. Thacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=68938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A divorce client can’t sue his lawyer for his problems with a PSA the client signed before he hired the lawyer, but the client may pursue claims alleging failure to respond to discovery requests, defend against pretrial motions and seek attorney’s fees, says a Fairfax Circuit Court. On April 5, 2006, in anticipation of divorce, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/08/10/divorce-clients-malpractice-claim-survives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
