<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Nathan C. Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-nathan-c-lee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:49:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Carrier Must Pay UIM Offered By Mistake&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/carrier-must-pay-uim-offered-by-mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/carrier-must-pay-uim-offered-by-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hopewell Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nathan C. Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Circuit Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although plaintiff’s insurance carrier mistakenly offered underinsured motorist coverage policy limits, the carrier nevertheless is bound by its offer of $25,000 UIM policy limits, in addition to the $100,000 liability coverage offered by defendant in the underlying auto accident case, and the Hopewell Circuit Court grants plaintiff’s motion to enforce settlement in this case of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/19/carrier-must-pay-uim-offered-by-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UIM carrier bound by acceptance of mistaken offer&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/16/uim-carrier-bound-by-mistaken-offer/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/16/uim-carrier-bound-by-mistaken-offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hopewell Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nathan C. Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=70841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An insurance carrier must pay its UIM policy limits even though an auto-accident plaintiff waited nearly two years to formally accept the settlement and the carrier might have avoided liability altogether. For plaintiff William Calvert, who alleged $75,000 in medical bills and lost wages from a 2009 auto accident, the extra $25,000 in underinsured motorist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2012/11/16/uim-carrier-bound-by-mistaken-offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
