<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Lawyers Weekly &#187; Judge Norman K. Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valawyersweekly.com/tag/judge-norman-k-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>VA Lawyers Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employer Rebuts Failure-to-Promote Claims&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/employer-rebuts-failure-to-promote-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/employer-rebuts-failure-to-promote-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An African-American male employed in a technician assembly position who alleges he has been passed over for promotion multiple times because of race cannot make out a prima facie case under Title VII, the Lynchburg U.S. District Court says; although plaintiff says employer altered job descriptions produced in discovery to make certain qualifications “required” instead [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/employer-rebuts-failure-to-promote-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still No Injunction in ‘JoeyBra’ Case&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/still-no-injunction-in-joeybra-case/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/still-no-injunction-in-joeybra-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville U.S. District Court declines to reconsider its denial of a preliminary injunction in this patent infringement lawsuit involving designs for pocketed bras. Plaintiff filed this patent infringement case in May 2012, which stems from a design patent, the ‘541 patent, that plaintiff received in 2001 for a bra design with pockets. Plaintiff became [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/still-no-injunction-in-joeybra-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lab Director’s Summary Judgment Motion ‘Premature’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/lab-directors-summary-judgment-motion-premature/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/lab-directors-summary-judgment-motion-premature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An African-American male and  former director of quality control for a Lynchburg manufacturer of fragrance and personal care products who alleges his racially-motivated termination ran  counter to the company’s progressive disciplinary policy, was disparate treatment when compared to Caucasian employees’ disciplinary history and violated Title VII, has proved that his suit was timely filed because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/23/lab-directors-summary-judgment-motion-premature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation Claim Works Without ‘Exact Words’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/08/defamation-claim-works-without-exact-words/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/08/defamation-claim-works-without-exact-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former cashier for Wal-Mart may sue for malicious prosecution based on her claim that her actions in applying “price match” discounts conformed to Wal-Mart’s policies and practices at the Lexington store and Wal-Mart had no basis for reporting her alleged embezzlement to police; the Lynchburg U.S. District Court also says plaintiff’s defamation claim under [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/08/defamation-claim-works-without-exact-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Jurisdiction from Kickstarter Donors&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/no-jurisdiction-from-kickstarter-donors/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/no-jurisdiction-from-kickstarter-donors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although defendant JoeyBra LLC received three donations from Virginia donors on Kickstarter .com, and shipped its pocketed-bra product to Virginia donors, the Charlottesville U.S. District Court nevertheless does not have personal jurisdiction over the two individual defendants in this patent infringement suit, and the court dismisses the two defendants. Plaintiff filed this patent infringement case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/05/03/no-jurisdiction-from-kickstarter-donors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Interlocutory Appeal of Waiver Issue&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/no-interlocutory-appeal-of-waiver-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/no-interlocutory-appeal-of-waiver-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this suit for breach of a lease agreement, a Lynchburg U.S. District Court denies defendant health care company’s motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal of the following issue: “whether a defendant filing a motion to transfer or stay waives any and all rights to object to personal jurisdiction.” I find the issue defendant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/no-interlocutory-appeal-of-waiver-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quiet Title Action Dismissed by Court&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/quiet-title-action-dismissed-by-court/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/quiet-title-action-dismissed-by-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=74016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville U.S. District Court dismisses plaintiff homeowners’ suit to quiet title which alleges the assignment of their deed of trust to defendant bank, as trustee for a loan trust, was invalid. In this case, plaintiffs allege basically the same facts they alleged in Blick I (Blick v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, No. 3:12cv00001, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/quiet-title-action-dismissed-by-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt Collector Proves ‘Bona Fide Error’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/debt-collector-proves-bona-fide-error/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/debt-collector-proves-bona-fide-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although an employee of defendant debt collector lost his place in his telephone script and omitted from his voicemail message the statement that the call was “an attempt to collect a debt by a debt collector,” defendant debt collection law firm wins summary judgment in this FDCPA case with its bona fide error defense, says [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/22/debt-collector-proves-bona-fide-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Profitability’ Defense Experts Excluded&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/profitability-defense-experts-excluded/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/profitability-defense-experts-excluded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prior to trial of claims by an owner of copyrighted t-shirt designs for infringement, a Charlottesville U.S. District Court grants plaintiff owner’s motion to exclude defendants’ expert report and expert testimony and motion in limine to preclude defendants from presenting evidence on profitability. Defendants designated Andrea Burke, its controller, as their corporate designee under Fed. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/profitability-defense-experts-excluded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Limits Suit Against Trustee&#160;</title>
		<link>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/court-limits-suit-against-trustee/</link>
		<comments>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/court-limits-suit-against-trustee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Elkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Norman K. Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court - Western District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valawyersweekly.com/?p=73562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Charlottesville U.S. District Court says that because the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is not incorporated into the terms of the Deed of Trust, a violation of the FDCPA cannot support a claim for breach of that agreement, and that claim must be dismissed. Plaintiffs claim the acceleration notice on a mortgage debt violated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/court-limits-suit-against-trustee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
